Imagine allowing the world's most brilliant scientists to live well past their natural lifespan.
Another point I want to add is that it is essentially necessary for a society to embrace it unless it can prevent it globally through treaties and whatnot (yeah right!). If your population stays traditional while other countries are rapidly filling with smarter and stronger citizens, you will eventually be out of competition. Perish. Along with your obsolete values.
That isn't exactly true.
Case study; the Amish. They have essentially shunned modern technology and live as they did 200 years ago. Currently modern technology is flying across at an insane rate, and yet the Amish survive and live happily.
Countries that do not embrace transhumanism will essentially be in the same boat. They may not contribute as much to society, but they will still exist.
I expect that some Western countries that are less religious (ie, not USA), as well as south east Asia will embrace new technology a lot faster than the middle east, and Africa. This is just speculation however.
I think it makes us a little less human, but maybe I'm just being stubborn here.
Maybe we should look into evolution and genetic modification instead. Make some super-babies and stuff. That way, their genetics are put into the gene pool, and we become better as a species.
Well, I'm not against it though. Giving a person a pump instead of a heart it he/she needs it is an awesome idea. Same with robotic arms and legs. I think it's something that should be used as a last resort, not something we should implement into everybody's lives.
Why do I feel like I'm missing something?