Toribash
Originally Posted by Datsick View Post
Here you guys go
http://buburuza.net/2008/08/seven-re...cientifically/

Ah, alright here we go.

1. Mayan Calendar

NASA seems to be a step ahead of you.

Let's quote some of the price lines from the article.

Q: What is the origin of the prediction that the world will end in 2012?
A: The story started with claims that Nibiru, a supposed planet discovered by the Sumerians, is headed toward Earth. This catastrophe was initially predicted for May 2003, but when nothing happened the doomsday date was moved forward to December 2012 and linked to the end of one of the cycles in the ancient Mayan calendar at the winter solstice in 2012 -- hence the predicted doomsday date of December 21, 2012.

Q: Is there a planet or brown dwarf called Nibiru or Planet X or Eris that is approaching the Earth and threatening our planet with widespread destruction?
A: Nibiru and other stories about wayward planets are an Internet hoax. There is no factual basis for these claims. If Nibiru or Planet X were real and headed for an encounter with the Earth in 2012, astronomers would have been tracking it for at least the past decade, and it would be visible by now to the naked eye. Obviously, it does not exist. Eris is real, but it is a dwarf planet similar to Pluto that will remain in the outer solar system; the closest it can come to Earth is about 4 billion miles.

2. Sun Storms

Your article states the following, with no evidence, statistics, or even explanations why to back it up:
This activity is predicted to get worse, and calculations suggest it’ll reach its deadly peak sometime in 2012

And this is what NASA says:
Q: Is there a danger from giant solar storms predicted for 2012?
A: Solar activity has a regular cycle, with peaks approximately every 11 years. Near these activity peaks, solar flares can cause some interruption of satellite communications, although engineers are learning how to build electronics that are protected against most solar storms. But there is no special risk associated with 2012. The next solar maximum will occur in the 2012-2014 time frame and is predicted to be an average solar cycle, no different than previous cycles throughout history.

3. The Atom Smasher

Your article states the following:
They’re predicting all manner of deadly results, including mini black holes. So when this machine is fired up for its first serious experiment in 2012, the world could be crushed into a super-dense blob the size of a basketball.

Pretty sure the LHC at CERN has already been in use since 2010. Why haven't we been sucked into a black hole yet then?

Actually, some theories have posited that micro-black holes may form at a limit far under that that actual black holes in space are speculated to form at. However unlikely, if micro-black holes form in the LHC, they would evaporate almost instantly.

4. The Bible says...

What? Where in the Bible, or any interpretation of the Bible, gives a date for Judgement Day? The first thing that comes to my head is that nutjob preacher that said the world would end in May.

5. Super Volcano

As unpredictable as volcanic activity may be, there is no evidence that Yellowstone will erupt any time in the near future (much less next month).

An article from National Geographic:
"It is not an imminent hazard," Girard said. "Every study has concluded that there is no magma that is ready to erupt within any foreseeable future."

6. The physicists

And this is why physicists aren't in charge of predicting disasters. Also, I'd like to see the source of this part of this already ludicrous article. I have nothing to say that this section hasn't already said for itself.

7. Slip-Slop-Slap- BANG!
Another quote from NASA's article:
Q: What is the polar shift theory? Is it true that the Earth's crust does a 180-degree rotation around the core in a matter of days if not hours?
A: A reversal in the rotation of Earth is impossible. There are slow movements of the continents (for example Antarctica was near the equator hundreds of millions of years ago), but that is irrelevant to claims of reversal of the rotational poles. However, many of the disaster websites pull a bait-and-switch to fool people. They claim a relationship between the rotation and the magnetic polarity of Earth, which does change irregularly, with a magnetic reversal taking place every 400,000 years on average. As far as we know, such a magnetic reversal doesn’t cause any harm to life on Earth. Scientists believe a magnetic reversal is very unlikely to happen in the next few millennia.

That article is nothing but a lot of baseless claims and pseudoscience. Just like the whole notion that the world is going to end in 2012.
Mei fati dominus, mei animi dux
Need to PM a SMod?

Unofficial Skimmer of Discussion!

Fabula Magnus wants more able RPers!
Cataclysm is still alive?


Thorn


Wiggi must love me forever now.