Cow, maybe you wouldn't have to keep on telling the same people they didn't read the article if you just cited what parts disagree with their claims. Just a suggestion, if you insist on responding to those you feel haven't read the bill. By the way, your claim that information flows only from the federal government to private entities disagrees with section (a)(2) and the subsections thereof. In particular, it gives private entities the right to (under the right conditions) share their private information within their system with other private entities and the federal government and vice versa.

In general the bill seems to have good intentions to me. I think that Americans' major concern is whether or not the general concept of due process will be undermined by CISPA. Personally, I don't know the Constitution like the back of my hand, so that's something I'd rather let the Supreme Court decide.

Also I don't see what was wrong with that banner. Presumably hampa or some other nabi affiliate was apposed to CISPA (Most likely meaning that they felt that it did violate their constitutional right to due process of law) and wished to express his or her concerns about the law to the Toribash Community. What's wrong with that? It even looked nice!