The bill does not infringe on any privacy

Originally Posted by deprav

Maybe you misunderstood some part of the bill Gorman, that's a possibility you need to consider.
From my point of view it does nothing but infringe "normal people's"privacy.
Governments and Companies don't make "treaties" to protect citizens, they work for their own profit/interest at the risk of deminishing other people's liberties.

And they don't need to call their next bill "Sopa" to reach the same goal, since they've already passed Cispa : they can deliver another bill that would seem vague by itself, but would take all its proportions with the things that we (you) let pass with Cispa.

Hell that's so fucking obvious ! Thinking the government and companies dropped the "Sopa project" because they couldn't make it pass the first time is naяve as it can be. We lose our liberty bit by bit : if they can't make it pass in 1 big block, they'll make it pass in 2 or 3 parts to anaesthetise people. But the goal is the same : less privacy, more control, less freedom.
That's just the direction the world is taking, how is that hard to consider ?

http://rt.com/usa/anonymous-internet...nst-cispa-164/

Originally Posted by darthigor

CISPA is only a way to warn the deep web users..