Hey guys u see these pros like cube owning Uke into pieces.u think there pros among pros but cmon guys. It's UKE. he just stands there! Id say a blue belt could do those replays of he tried! Now, whats your opinion on this?

Sadly, all these puny foolish replay makers spend a little bit of time working on their problems as they have so much, but if you give me a game wiht me vs them in mp ill pwn them all

Seeing as belts are measures of Multiplayer experience and have nothing to do with Singleplayer replays, I can not see why you would even mention that.

In any case, replay-making still requires a working knowledge of the game that can pretty much only come with practice. You could probably do well if you passed a physics course, too.

+10 points for making a decent Off-Topic thread, though.

Winning against uke is easy of course, but that's not enough to make a proper replay. A proper replay has smooth and stylish movement, a proper flow and a speciality. The speciality can be mass destruction, simpleness, tricks, skeets or something unique. Making a replay is easy, but making a proper replay takes a lot of practise and time.

One other thing I have to say is belt has nothing to do with sp. Shook, Hours and Meamme0 are all blue belters, but they all are pretty skilled in sp.

Pff replay making takes like 5 minutes are you kidding me. it's like so easy. just look at my belt. it's for noobs man, mp is all that matters. all skill man. judo.


I can take you.

hello there

my name is Shook

i am a blue belt and also the leader of ORMO

i find this to be an amusing coincidence

Please give a better comparison than "blue belt", because belt means about as much as a fermented pile of shit in your drawer when it comes to replay making. I was a white belt for a LONG time, because i didn't and still don't care much for multiplayer. I have also seen cases of people with belts much higher than me being terrible at replays (and people with lower belt than me being epic), because they're used to making quick and effective moves rather than the long, elaborate and preferrably stylish moves that are commonplace in the replay making scene. Besides that, qi is games played, not games won.

Dude my point is replay makers aren't so pro. . And with belt comes experience in which you learn alot of things.
-----
Guys my point is replay makers aren't so pro and sht. Uke just stands there. if u can do that stuff online your pro. And I want YOUR opinion on this. Not getting stuck on me with the blue belt thing.

in a land filled with alts you can't judge someone by their belt. Also I've seen higher belt people fucking suck. so yeah.



Also replaymaking is a different aim than mp is. And people have already given you you're answer.

zing


Well then please read what Oracle actually said (highlight in case you tunnel vision past the rest of this), because he basically didn't mention belts at all. In fact, he provided several excellent points as to why replay makers are every bit as pro as good online players. Now since you mention getting stuck on things, please consider looking away from the fact that Uke is stationary, and start considering exactly how difficult it actually is to pull off some of the things that people do pull off. In fact, try it. It's not NEARLY as easy as you seem to think it is.

Besides that, comparing the two is a moot point to begin with. It's like comparing boxers to parkour runners, and then saying the parkour runners suck because the buildings don't move. You can be a pro boxer, and you can be a pro parkour runner. Hell, you can be both at the same time, there are a fair few members in ORMO who are also very capable online players.

BUT PLEASE DO NOT

USE PRO AS A BLANKET TERM

Because a pro online player is NOT automatically a pro replay maker, and vice versa. Online play is about having a good opener and being able to adapt and predict as the match progresses, whereas replay making is more about knowing what to do to accomplish what you want to do in a visually impressive manner. Once again, please try your hand at it before senselessly declaring it to not be hard or pro or whatever, because by your logic, you should easily be able to make replays good enough to impress most of the community.

If you feel extremely confident, try making three replays and apply for ORMO membership. I guarantee you'll be judged fairly, but it will not be easy.

Then try right now. You make it sound like it should be easy, so why don't you go and do it?

Implying it's harder to beat a player, rather than make something aesthetically pleasing to multiple people. Which it isn't. People are idiots, and it only takes a little bit of practice to learn how to let the person beat themselves. Weak joints that you can focus, joints that can no longer be moves when grabbed at expense of breaking, adapting to a readable move. Multiplayer can be broken down into a slightly more complicated game of rock, paper, scissors.

Single player requires both an understanding of the game, and an understanding of your audience. Anybody can break every joint in uke's body if given a chance, not many can break every joint in under 100 frames. Anybody can cause 5 dismemberments. Not everybody can cause 5 dismemberments in one hit with one body part. Everybody can travel 250 distance to hit uke. Not everybody can travel 3000 distance to hit uke, and even fewer can do that while still looking stylish, and even fewer can do that with any semblance to realism. Everything in this game is possible, but it's the fact that only a few can do it faster, smoother, and better that makes them look like gods among men. And not everybody gets there in the same time. It took me a couple years before I made my first good looking single player replay, and it took me almost a year after that before I had any semblance of recognition. In that time, I've seen people literally arrive on the scene and shake it up in it's entirety. I've also seen people who never went any further than the most basic single player replays. Much more of the latter rather than the former.