Sissykick, I understand that these are your opinions based on your personal preference. Whatever you choose to put a premium on is your choice and I respect that but claiming that any artist will raise the estimated value of his or her work based on the amount of time used on producing it is something that I won't agree on. I feel like that's a wrong way to value art. I wish more people would look at artists as artists, not just as plain craftsmen.

<P>I'm gonna end this here before more petty insults, I just want to say is you look on any website that helps novice artists price their work time will be a factor. I also won't bother explaining the eraser comment because it is apparently over your head and I don't feel like repeating myself. These are just opinions, and I respect yours Hanz but please understand I don't have to agree with you because you think you out debated me.</P>

illv I know its a blanket statement, i'm aware there are many other things to consider for the price. My main objective here was to show my opinion on why people assume high-detail should cost more than simplistic in a lot of cases. Were talking about toribash artists for the most part, were not talking fine-arts here lol.

It's also not my preference. I prefer simplistic sets, just look at the set I've had forever now that I got recolored many times. I'm stating my opinion on why I think detailed sets are assumed to be more valuable, nvm the fact that simple sets are a dime a dozen, and a well done highly detailed set is quite rare imo