Secret Santa 2024
Originally Posted by cowmeat View Post
And before someone says: "Doesn't the fetus have a right to its own body" Well kind of yes, but is the right of a functionless mesh of cells that cant even feel pain larger than a full grown humans?

Adding on to this a bit, this is why Ele suggested that we try and figure out at what point a developing fetus can be counted as a human. I am unable to find any references because I don't know the exact wording, but in the US, there are laws in place that say that you are in charge of your own body, even as a baby. This is why you must personally sign up to be an organ donor. These laws even apply to corpses. Morticians cannot take organs from a dead man's body and give them to the hostpital to use in transplants unless that person previously signed up as a donor. This is where the whole abortion debate gets hazy. Of course the mother has a right to her own body, but what about the fetus? Surely if a dead person still has rights over their own body, shouldn't a fetus as well? And then these questions loop back into the debate over whether a fetus is really a person or not.
All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’'s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.
I am going with this this. When the fetus develops a beating heart and a functioning consciousness, a possibility to feel suffering, then it becomes a baby. Most fetuses get aborted before this stage, tho.
h
Originally Posted by hawkesnightmare View Post
Adding on to this a bit, this is why Ele suggested that we try and figure out at what point a developing fetus can be counted as a human. I am unable to find any references because I don't know the exact wording, but in the US, there are laws in place that say that you are in charge of your own body, even as a baby. This is why you must personally sign up to be an organ donor. These laws even apply to corpses. Morticians cannot take organs from a dead man's body and give them to the hostpital to use in transplants unless that person previously signed up as a donor. This is where the whole abortion debate gets hazy. Of course the mother has a right to her own body, but what about the fetus? Surely if a dead person still has rights over their own body, shouldn't a fetus as well? And then these questions loop back into the debate over whether a fetus is really a person or not.


We discussed in lenght of this with Ele in irc. Alot of things were said and discussed but in a nutshell: It doesnt matter even if the fetus has right to its own body 1st trimester. The rights of the mother trump those rights 1000x.

When it gets to later stages of developement things change, but supposing we are talking about pretty early fetuses

Not every right/value is equal
why is this even a discussion.

if you got raped would you want a rapist's child?

better question if you knew your child was going to be mentally handicapped would you want him/her to suffer through life?

OH EVEN BETTER

if you're a teen and you know you're not capable of taking care of the child , isn't it smarter to get rid of the baby then raise it as trash so it can produce more trash?
=
Originally Posted by Velair View Post
why is this even a discussion.

if you got raped would you want a rapist's child?
One of the few situations in which abortion is a reasonable solution.

better question if you knew your child was going to be mentally handicapped would you want him/her to suffer through life?
Why don't we just kill all disabled people too so they don't have to suffer through life? Yay eugenics! Because life is suffering, and because deciding who gets to live is wrong, that's why.

OH EVEN BETTER

if you're a teen and you know you're not capable of taking care of the child , isn't it smarter to get rid of the baby then raise it as trash so it can produce more trash?
"I'm stupid trash and having a stupid trash kid is a terrible decision so I'll run the risk of getting pregnant anyways and just terminate the pregnancy because that's what responsible people do!" How about not saying it's the responsible thing to have an abortion. It's responsible for the person to get their shit together and raise the child correctly, it is not responsible to get pregnant and terminate the pregnancy because you feel like it.

See, that's the thing

If you give birth to the child first and then make the same choice, it becomes murder. Where exactly do you cross that line? Why do we forgo all responsibility and kick the can down the road? If you don't want a kid, either triple up on the birth control to make the chances of a pregnancy virtually impossible or get your tubes tied/snipped, be responsible. Abortions are not pleasant for anyone, it doesn't take a whole lot of effort to not be in that situation to begin with. That's not to say it should be illegal, I firmly believe people should have the right to make their own decisions, but stupid people will constantly make stupid decisions. People have to be forced to be responsible for their actions or they will constantly do dumb things.

I believe the only thing that would truly solve this problem is to promote or reward responsibility. Free birth control, free sterilization procedures, free classes on how to not be an irresponsible dickwad. Accountability is important.
Hoss.
Sure it is more responsible to turn into a decent and caring parent, but you can't expect everyone who gets pregnant accidentally to be able to do that (which admittedly makes them a worse person). Being responsible for an abortion is probably better than being responsible for fucking up a child by not loving or having the ability to properly support it. But of course, this is ignoring other options like foster homes.
Good morning sweet princess
Originally Posted by Hyde View Post
-snip-

so you're saying provide free birth control and teach not to be stupid and have sex when you're ready for the many possible consequences w0w thanks 4 summing up my whole 8th grade health class.

you realize this wont change anything. dumb people will always be dumb, you can't teach those who choose to be ignorant. also yes accountability is important but by all means if they want to spend money to get rid of a child they you know would be a mistake go for it.
Originally Posted by Ele View Post
"Which of these did you miss?"
Evidently, both of them :P

Someone talked earlier, maybe it was you, about accountability to raise a child coming from a contract or obligation that comes from having sex.

I don't think that whenever you have sex with someone unprotected, you're locking yourself into some legal/moral contract that says you have to raise a baby together. You're not. Abortions are an option now, and it's not such a taboo anymore. We're living in a world where, if we personally decide to, we can have abortions. The social pressures that created this old-timey obligation or 'contract' don't exist nowadays - it's an outdated concept.

Go back and re-read it because you missed a fair chunk of it. Please read before you post.

Originally Posted by cigarillo View Post
so you're saying provide free birth control and teach not to be stupid and have sex when you're ready for the many possible consequences w0w thanks 4 summing up my whole 8th grade health class.

you realize this wont change anything. dumb people will always be dumb, you can't teach those who choose to be ignorant. also yes accountability is important but by all means if they want to spend money to get rid of a child they you know would be a mistake go for it.

People don't choose to be ignorant, ignorance is a consequence of no education. No one wants to have an abortion the same way people don't want to have a car accident. Sure, it happens as a result of a bad decision, but that's no reason to not make sure everyone is educated to a firm standard and has sufficient supplies to apply their education. If you drill it into everyone's head, it will stick.
Hoss.
Originally Posted by Hyde View Post
Go back and re-read it because you missed a fair chunk of it. Please read before you post.

Uhh, no. I made a legit point. Respond to it.

"You are either intending to make a baby, or are using contraceptives. Contraceptives aren't perfect, leading to unwanted pregnancies, a consequence of casual sex. The legal contract that would exist in the case of abortion being illegal(except in certain circumstances) would require a woman to give birth."

That is what you said.
Last edited by Ele; Jul 21, 2015 at 06:10 AM.