Well i'll just post my opinion here. Bob will be the guy i blame.
Bob: "The ISIS is a grave problem, it needs to be fixed"
statements like these really don't make sense if you think about it.
Of course everyone who believes and fights for ISIS might have different goals in their actions, but in the eyes of Bob their goal might be something of the lines of "to kill everyone who doesn't believe their religion/beliefs". By fixing this problem, should i assume that Bob's implying that we should get rid of all the people who believe and fight for ISIS? If so, what kind of a difference would that make between Bob and the people he's trying to get rid of? He would be supporting the idea of killing people for their beliefs (which is the same thing he thinks that the ISIS is doing).
For me, there is no right or wrong side in this. (The words right and wrong, evil and good don't have any solid meaning to me) So i will not blame either side, because if i did i would be blaiming people for having beliefs and opinion, which i try not to do.
I would choose to support against ISIS, but i wouldn't say they're doing anything wrong, if there were any rights and wrongs. (I believe that people use right and wrong as terms more suitable for themselves and rules they choose to abide (i am no different))
And the whole ordeal about the immigrants is a problem that is unsolveable, as in everyone is happy (in my head at least). As i saw, people don't want immigrants coming into their country, which is respectable, in their thought it might go like immigrants=danger to their everyday life. Which could be a thing, or they just don't want to live in a place that's "not pure" for them. In any case these people have their opinion. But the government might let immigrants in on their own judgement or by the wishes of the majority. In any case the people who don't want to let the immigrants into their home country probably wouldn't do anything against the government except badmouth them. So, if you weren't as dumb as me, you would see that it comes down to belief and opinion, in which case there can't be a euthopia.
I've blabbered enough, i'll end my thoughts on that.
Bob: "The ISIS is a grave problem, it needs to be fixed"
statements like these really don't make sense if you think about it.
Of course everyone who believes and fights for ISIS might have different goals in their actions, but in the eyes of Bob their goal might be something of the lines of "to kill everyone who doesn't believe their religion/beliefs". By fixing this problem, should i assume that Bob's implying that we should get rid of all the people who believe and fight for ISIS? If so, what kind of a difference would that make between Bob and the people he's trying to get rid of? He would be supporting the idea of killing people for their beliefs (which is the same thing he thinks that the ISIS is doing).
For me, there is no right or wrong side in this. (The words right and wrong, evil and good don't have any solid meaning to me) So i will not blame either side, because if i did i would be blaiming people for having beliefs and opinion, which i try not to do.
I would choose to support against ISIS, but i wouldn't say they're doing anything wrong, if there were any rights and wrongs. (I believe that people use right and wrong as terms more suitable for themselves and rules they choose to abide (i am no different))
And the whole ordeal about the immigrants is a problem that is unsolveable, as in everyone is happy (in my head at least). As i saw, people don't want immigrants coming into their country, which is respectable, in their thought it might go like immigrants=danger to their everyday life. Which could be a thing, or they just don't want to live in a place that's "not pure" for them. In any case these people have their opinion. But the government might let immigrants in on their own judgement or by the wishes of the majority. In any case the people who don't want to let the immigrants into their home country probably wouldn't do anything against the government except badmouth them. So, if you weren't as dumb as me, you would see that it comes down to belief and opinion, in which case there can't be a euthopia.
I've blabbered enough, i'll end my thoughts on that.
Bob: "The ISIS is a grave problem, it needs to be fixed"
statements like these really don't make sense if you think about it.
What, are you saying Isis is not a problem?
For me, there is no right or wrong side in this. (The words right and wrong, evil and good don't have any solid meaning to me)So i will not blame either side, because if i did i would be blaiming people for having beliefs and opinion, which i try not to do.
So you are saying if I believe I should kill all the children in my neighborhood, you would be ok with it because you do not blame me for having a different opinion?
I would choose to support against ISIS, but i wouldn't say they're doing anything wrong
Come again?
I don't agree with any of your points to be honest
\o\ | ORMO | OSHI | OLDA | [duck] | Team Canada | Maple Syrup United | Team Philippines | [UssR] | Anime United | /o/
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»