Originally Posted by eReckt
In 1970, the US Congress placed marijuana in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act because they considered it to have "no accepted medical use." Since then, 25 of 50 US states and DC have legalized the medical use of marijuana.
Idea taken from procon.org , wanted to know what you folks thought about whether Marijuana should be used in Medical practice. My opinion : Marijuana isn't safe enough to me used commonly in medical practice. It's an addictive drug, and could possibly leave the recipient craving the drug, even after treatment was finished. It can also cause problems with fertility, as well as injure the lungs, immune system, and nervous system.
What are your thoughts?
I feel like you're trying to bait people with the "Marijuana is addictive" bit.
That is not true at all, and I'm living proof. I used to be an avid smoker for a few years, but this year I decided to stop so I could focus on school. I had no problems at all with stopping. I don't have the urge to smoke at all, but I know that it can be a good time.
Stop being ignorant. Another thing, it doesn't do anything to the immune system or the nervous system, so I have no fucking clue where the hell you got that from or what fucked up sources you got that from (unless you're actually believing what the school system tells you)
Valterain1 was defeated by hermaphrodite on Oct 17, 2015.
If you don't think you can develop a dependency/addiction on marijuana you're very wrong.
http://www.narconon.org/drug-abuse/m...addictive.html
https://www.drugabuse.gov/publicatio...uana-addictive
Just because you weren't addicted doesn't mean it's not addictive. That's like if I injected some heroin and didn't get addicted, I could conclude that it's not addictive.
>inb4 heroin is more addictive (I know, it's an analogy. they're both addictive to different extents.)
http://www.narconon.org/drug-abuse/m...addictive.html
https://www.drugabuse.gov/publicatio...uana-addictive
Just because you weren't addicted doesn't mean it's not addictive. That's like if I injected some heroin and didn't get addicted, I could conclude that it's not addictive.
>inb4 heroin is more addictive (I know, it's an analogy. they're both addictive to different extents.)
Originally Posted by Surfings
If you don't think you can develop a dependency/addiction on marijuana you're very wrong.
http://www.narconon.org/drug-abuse/m...addictive.html
https://www.drugabuse.gov/publicatio...uana-addictive
Just because you weren't addicted doesn't mean it's not addictive. That's like if I injected some heroin and didn't get addicted, I could conclude that it's not addictive.
>inb4 heroin is more addictive (I know, it's an analogy. they're both addictive to different extents.)
You just cited a government page and an organization.
You're making yourself seem stupider and stupider.
Not only that, but even if it was "addictive" like you said it is, then why aren't there any physical withdrawals to prove it?
Valterain1 was defeated by hermaphrodite on Oct 17, 2015.
Originally Posted by Valterain1
You just cited a government page and an organization.
You're making yourself seem stupider and stupider.
Not only that, but even if it was "addictive" like you said it is, then why aren't there any physical withdrawals to prove it?
Websites ending with .com are much more susceptible to bias. Calling me stupid doesn't make you right, just ignorant.
https://www.marijuana-anonymous.org/...from-marijuana
Evidence of physical withdrawals.
