Toribash
Original Post
Mercy Killing - Right or Wrong?
In light of recent events in England, I created this thread to find out what other people's opinions are on this subject.

Originally Posted by BBC NEWS
A mother convicted of murdering her disabled son by injecting him with heroin at a Hertfordshire care home has been jailed for life.

Mr Inglis suffered brain damage when he fell out of an ambulance in July 2007.

Ms Inglis said: "I held him, told him I loved him, told him everything was going to be fine, took the syringe, and I injected him in his thigh and his arm.
"I knew I had to help him. I asked myself what Tom would want. He wouldn't have wanted to live like this.
"I asked myself what I would want. I would want someone to love me enough to help me die.
"That's why I thought heroin - a painless, peaceful death. He went to sleep. He was at peace. I stayed with him."

The whole article can be found here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8470572.stm

I personally think that she did the right thing. She knows her own son better than anyone else would have done, so she would know what was best for him. In this case, it was release from the pain and torment of being unable to control his own body. Seeing as she did not have enough money to take him to Switzerland and get it done legally, she did it in the most efficient and pain-free way she could.

If I was paralysed from the neck down tomorrow, I am sure that I would want my own mother to do something similar. I told her this earlier today, and she said that she probably would.

So guys, what do you think?
I'm completely with the mother, it's the only thing she could have done, except for letting him live a miserable life. I don't see it as murder at all.
[19:39] <Birdflu> I'm just sad that I can't give myself one
[19:39] <Birdflu> I'd have a great time
Agreed. She was jailed wrongly. She did what she could to help him and apparently killing him was the only way. I do think the arrest had more to do with the fact that she didn't do it legally. Maybe...

I thought about it, and this is the first time I've seen something sorta-heart-warming and morbid at the same time.
[18:04:54] <aracoon> Eureka is a powerhungry fag
______________
[13:13] <Eureka> also dota is kinda for pigfuckers
[13:13] <jalis> ban eureka
[13:13] <jalis> thanks
The mother did the right thing, thatīs for sure.

In the other hand:

Unfortunately, itīs illegal. So, i donīt think she was jailed wrongly, or didnīt she knew it was illegal? Itīs law, itīs forbidden. She has a reason to be in prison.
This sig lacks creativity.

True Story.
Originally Posted by Take-Out_Ninja View Post
Agreed. She was jailed wrongly. She did what she could to help him and apparently killing him was the only way. I do think the arrest had more to do with the fact that she didn't do it legally. Maybe...

Originally Posted by fcpavao View Post
Unfortunately, itīs illegal. So, i donīt think she was jailed wrongly, or didnīt she knew it was illegal? Itīs law, itīs forbidden. She has a reason to be in prison.

I debated with myself if I should include the jail sentence in the discussion, but decided against it. Mainly because she did break the law as it currently stands in England, leaving the judge and jury very little choice but to find her guilty
Just how damaged was his brain?
It's a pretty important factor to consider in cases like these.

If his cerebral cortex was all mush, then he was already dead as far as i am concerned.
If he retained cognitive function though....it's a different story.

The video in the article implied that they were going to "unplug" him, so i think he was braindead. In that case, injection of heroin is indeed far more humane than slow death from starvation and dehydration. I agree it's messed up that starving a patient to death is considered legal and humane, but ending his "life" painlessly isn't. He is going to die either way.
Mercy killing is a good thing, but you can't just do it. You need a doctor to do it, because they know what they're doing.

But how do we know these deaths are painless? Nobody's had it happen and lived to tell about the experience.



On a side note: Holy shit, rafufu lives in England. I didn't know that.
i liek turtelz xd
This is a serious topic for me, seeing as I'm aspiring to become a doctor.

I believe 100% in mercy killing, if the patient wants it to happen.

Mercy killing, by my definition, only counts if the person is:-
o In extreme pain every day.
o Is medically "brain dead"
o Is paralysed neck-down with no hope of overcoming it
o Has a terminal illness which would lead to a slow and painfull death
o Is medically depressed.

Of course, I won't be allowed to do the mercy killing.

Regarding the woman going to jail: Although I believe what she did was right... it was against the laws of the country, and as such she still deserved the punishment.

Swizerland has it sorted. XD
i agree fully with what she did. mercy killing is very much humane, and SHOULDN'T be classified as murder. unfortunately, it is, but she'll be able to keep her head high in jail.

also, "fell out of an ambulance"? the ambulance-drivers should be convicted for ending his life, not her.
|11:33| ŧŧ [shark] so you're saying that you just paid 80 euros for pussy
|11:33| ŧŧ [Quit] [x] shark [[email protected]] [Quit:]
Originally Posted by Dalir View Post
i agree fully with what she did. mercy killing is very much humane, and SHOULDN'T be classified as murder. unfortunately, it is, but she'll be able to keep her head high in jail.

also, "fell out of an ambulance"? the ambulance-drivers should be convicted for ending his life, not her.

Well, he got agitated inside the ambulance and tried to open the doors, pushed them too hard and fell out. There wasn't really much that the paramedics could do