Toribash
Originally Posted by ChrisDom View Post
Refer to 20:30, when he saids, "Many people can go shopping without becoming shopaholics."

Same thing.

Not everyone who smoked a cigarette, continues to smoke. While nicotine is seen as "addictive". If something was addictive on its own, without your control, you wouldn't be able to stop. Understanding psychology plays a part in it, basically the, "Why are drug addicts addicted to X drug?" it's not the drug that makes them addicted to it. It's the problems that lead to the use of the drug and the effect that overlaps the problem. Therefore, you seek more to avoid your problem. This is my take on it. For example, who likes the taste of alcohol? Not many without acquiring the taste for it and then, why did you acquire a taste for such a thing?

Beers could contain chloride, phosphates, sulfates, nitrates and fluoride.

Defining "Addiction" is a difficult thing. Not the definition of addiction but the concept of addiction and why it happens.

Part 3 is where the solutions begin. Parts 1 and 2 are the introductions to the ideas and the reflection of what we have done.

Surely you're not saying (or he's saying, whatever, I'm going to watch it later) that purely psychological addictions are the same thing as for example, a heroine addiction? Do you see "shopaholics" throwing up and having mental breakdowns because they can't go shopping? There's a difference between wanting to do something because it makes you feel good (over-eating, over-gambling, over-shopping, over-exercising, the list goes on), and being stuck with a body that craves whatever chemical you started putting into your body, and retaliates physically if it doesn't get it. Nicotine is a weak chemical, the only physical retaliation will be feeling a bit cranky. The psychological part comes into play when you've fooled yourself into a need you don't really have; relying on it.

But, I'm posting this without context and I'll come back when I've watched it. Even though most of what was said in the earlier Zeitgeists was bullshit, I like what he's doing. Rock on, the truth is out there.
|11:33| »» [shark] so you're saying that you just paid 80 euros for pussy
|11:33| »» [Quit] [x] shark [[email protected]] [Quit:]
Originally Posted by ChrisDom View Post
World War 2 began on September 1, 1939 and ended on September 2, 1945. It lasted exactly six years and one day

Estimated costs during World War 2.
Japan about $ 40,000,000,000.
Germany about $ 200,000,000.000.
Britain about $50,000,000.
USA about $300,000,000.
USSR about $ 90,000,000,000.

Which equals, $330,350,000,000

Now from 1939 to 2012* (*The supposed end of the world)
That's 73 years. I think it's enough done properly.
Now, WATCH THE VIDEO BEFORE YOU START THROWING SHIT EVERYWHERE

Keep in mind, I am not a historian.
These results are from about 5 minutes of using modern technology available AKA Google.

Money does not spontaneously create resources. Money is essentially a placeholder, used to measure the value of something. It is an ever changing quantity. To imply that money alone could sustain humanity is ridiculous.

Secondly, I doubt the creator believes that 2012 is the end of the world, and if he does, then this movie is even more insane.

How long humanity will survive is an unknown.
How long all resources will sustain us is unknown.
The exact usage of resources in WWII is unknown.
And he has calculated this?
Give me a break.
Buy TC for a great price here! http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=240345
Buy VIP and Toriprime for a great price here! http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=237249


Hey look more than two lines.
Originally Posted by dalir View Post
Surely you're not saying (or he's saying, whatever, I'm going to watch it later) that purely psychological addictions are the same thing as for example, a heroine addiction? Do you see "shopaholics" throwing up and having mental breakdowns because they can't go shopping? There's a difference between wanting to do something because it makes you feel good (over-eating, over-gambling, over-shopping, over-exercising, the list goes on), and being stuck with a body that craves whatever chemical you started putting into your body, and retaliates physically if it doesn't get it. Nicotine is a weak chemical, the only physical retaliation will be feeling a bit cranky. The psychological part comes into play when you've fooled yourself into a need you don't really have; relying on it.

But, I'm posting this without context and I'll come back when I've watched it. Even though most of what was said in the earlier Zeitgeists was bullshit, I like what he's doing. Rock on, the truth is out there.

Yes. This happens to some shopaholics, of course not every shopaholic throws up and breaks down but an example of this would be an episode of "True life - I'm a compulsive shopper" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOvUbV_WWb0) I believe somewhere in this episode, one of the girls breaks down.

I personally think that doing something because it feels good is an addiction. Addiction to masturbation, Addiction to Sex etc.

And then we have addictions where we blame the drug itself, (heroine, crack, cigarettes)

You become addicted to the feeling you get.
[10:17][10:50] <diskimage> Where can I find the Toribash license?
Originally Posted by ChrisDom View Post
Yes. This happens to some shopaholics, of course not every shopaholic throws up and breaks down but an example of this would be an episode of "True life - I'm a compulsive shopper" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOvUbV_WWb0) I believe somewhere in this episode, one of the girls breaks down.

I personally think that doing something because it feels good is an addiction. Addiction to masturbation, Addiction to Sex etc.

And then we have addictions where we blame the drug itself, (heroine, crack, cigarettes)

You become addicted to the feeling you get.

Cheap reality shows are not actual reality.
Secondly, if that in fact actually ever did happen in real life (it won't and it doesn't) it would not be a forced physical reaction, but a product of the girl's mental state at being prevented from doing something she is obsessed with. Screaming and crying because someone takes your copy of WoW (famous video etc.) is not the same thing as actual withdrawal symptoms.
Buy TC for a great price here! http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=240345
Buy VIP and Toriprime for a great price here! http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=237249


Hey look more than two lines.
Originally Posted by Boredpayne View Post
Cheap reality shows are not actual reality.
Secondly, if that in fact actually ever did happen in real life (it won't and it doesn't) it would not be a forced physical reaction, but a product of the girl's mental state at being prevented from doing something she is obsessed with. Screaming and crying because someone takes your copy of WoW (famous video etc.) is not the same thing as actual withdrawal symptoms.

You can sit here all day and completely blast everything without even watching the damn thing.

No shit, reality shows aren't real reality. But shopping addiction is an addiction people have problems with or there wouldn't be THIS

For now, I'm just going to ignore you until you watch it because i'm not going to argue with you when you don't even understand what this whole thing is about. You just seem to be the one asshole who likes to sit in the back and disregard everything because you're too edgy to care.
Last edited by ChrisDom; Jan 31, 2011 at 02:10 AM.
[10:17][10:50] <diskimage> Where can I find the Toribash license?
Originally Posted by ChrisDom View Post
You can sit here all day and completely blast everything without even watching the damn thing.

Kind of says something about its credibility, doesn't it?

Originally Posted by ChrisDom
No shit, reality shows aren't real reality. But shopping addiction is an addiction people have problems with or there wouldn't be THIS

The point was that it's not an addiction in a physical sense, it's a psychological impulse as a response to anxiety. Hey cool, I got that from a google search result.

Originally Posted by ChrisDom
For now, I'm just going to ignore you until you watch it because i'm not going to argue with you when you don't even understand what this whole thing is about.

You want me to waste two hours sitting through a film that discredits itself in the first 7 minutes created by a historian whose films are renowned for their hyperbole, misquotes, and conspiracy theory bullshit? No thanks. How many other people in this thread have watched the full film, knowing zeitgeist's reputation?
Originally Posted by ChrisDom
You just seem to be the one asshole who likes to sit in the back and disregard everything because you're too edgy to care.

Oh yeah, I'm "disregarding everything" by pointing out the logical fallacies, and I'm only doing it because that makes me cool.
Jesus christ, what a five year old attitude.
Last edited by Boredpayne; Jan 31, 2011 at 02:35 AM.
Buy TC for a great price here! http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=240345
Buy VIP and Toriprime for a great price here! http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=237249


Hey look more than two lines.
Originally Posted by Boredpayne View Post
Kind of says something about its credibility, doesn't it?

If you don't even give it a chance, why are any of your posts relevant? They aren't.
[10:17][10:50] <diskimage> Where can I find the Toribash license?
Originally Posted by Boredpayne View Post
Oh yeah, I'm "disregarding everything" by pointing out the logical fallacies, and I'm only doing it because that makes me cool.
Jesus christ, what a five year old attitude.

Perhaps what ChrisDom is saying is that when you only nitpick the details, you miss the big picture. In the original Zeitgeist, the scholarship is certainly lacking, but the three main areas are worth looking into. The spirit of the piece can still be valuable even if it's presentation is flawed. It's foolish to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I get what you're saying, logic. I do understand that the message is important. The thing is, I don't find it necessary to try and handle all of that shit at once. And to agree with Bored while quoting myself, such misinformation deals a large blow to something that appears to be so imperative. It's sort of like having a troll-who's epeen-is-larger fight on the internet. Since your dignity is on the line, you can't really afford to mess something up.
(sorry for the irrelevant metaphor)
Thanks.
A few things you need to learn.
The term agency, in terms of sociology. And whats the issue at hand: cooperation vs survival of the fittest.
Most of what they talk about are just different schools of thought. This seems to be a collection of all the non-mainstream ones.

Stuff as I go along:

Genes is not a holistic approach. Durr.

You need to learn the history about how "money" was built up. I like the part where this guy pulls up 5 or 6 lines as a quote to prove a point. Cool. You're taking a centuries old text and applying it directly to today. No. What happened to viewing it in context of it's environment? The analysis of "Wealth of Nations" should only be taken in context of developing economy. Things are different/evolved now.

Quality of life measurement isn't a new idea. I forgot what it's called, but it exists already. The causal relation they make between GDP and quality of life is absurd.

They never talk about VALUE. VALUE is a huge basis of economics. They never talk about it. There are low cost providers and premium providers. If things are planned to become obsolete, then why do people buy it? People will VALUE good products. Competition would not allow for a premium provider to partake in planned obsolescence. Easy game theory. See: Why do you buy good tasting burgers instead of shitty cheap ones?

[I stopped at 1h04, got work tomorrow]

People spin stories. If you doubt the mainstream, you should doubt this video as well.
Last edited by FNugget; Jan 31, 2011 at 04:40 AM.