HTOTM: FUSION
Original Post
One of those debates about gun laws.
I am going to try to keep this simple:
What should the laws concerning the purchasing, ownership and use of firearms be?
Please try to add your own opinions and ideas on the matter rather than just tearing apart other people's posts. If you can't offer any actual progression to the discussion then I would appreciate it if you could not just use this thread to argue trivialities. I am not asking you to ignore other people's posts, but it sure would be nice if you could try to think about the ideas people are describing rather than simply the description of the ideas. If someone is being vague don't tell them that there argument is invalid because of gross use of sweeping generalisations. You can always just ask them what they mean.

If the last paragraph was a bit too long please tell me and I will shorten it.

~Proto
Good morning sweet princess
I live in the US. Specifically, Illinois. We have the strictest gun laws in the country, excluding Washington DC itself, which has a "no guns at all unless you are military/Secret Service etc." policy. The way it is now, you need to get a gun ownership card to legally buy and own a gun, and you must present it to a police officer if you are talking to them and you have a firearm on you. In some states, the officer is allowed to take your firearm and make sure it is not loaded, or if it is allowed to be loaded, a round is not chambered (Florida is an example of this policy)

Personally, I think this is a very good idea, but could use a small tweak. Most other states have some variation of "You don't need a gun ownership card if you are buying a longgun (shotgun or rifle), but for handguns, you are required to have a card. Most states' reasoning for this is that it is very hard to conceal a longgun, and if it is concealed, it will be very difficult to get to quickly and therefore hard to quickly pull it out and shoot someone.
All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’'s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.
Just out of interest, what process do you have to go through to get a gun ownership card!
Good morning sweet princess
You walk into a gun shop, tell them you want to apply for one, they give you a form and you fill it out and give it back to them with some amount of money (I think it's $15, but I can't remember for sure), the gun shop sends the form to the state police department, who does a background check on you and makes sure you're not a felon or crazy. This process takes anywhere from a few weeks to a couple months (I was processed in about a month and a half) and then if you are approved, they mail you your card.

I believe they used to take a picture of you to send in as well, but sometime in the last few years, they started to just use the picture on your drivers' license.

That's the process for Illinois. I imagine it's the same with most other states. The only thing I can imagine that would be different would be the price of the card.
All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’'s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.
This is a societal and cultural problem, all you have to do is educate people and improve your support systems. High rates of gun ownership and ease of access to guns is not inherently a bad thing.


So let's talk about the US. They have problems teaching even basic maths and literature, can they really handle teaching people to be responsible? You can't recall millions of guns, you can't really police them without an absurd amount of money. USA is fucked, I don't think there's a magic bullet.

Is there anything to help? Sure, mental health registry, I know the liberals will scream discrimination, but handing guns to chronically depressed people isn't working out too well.
Other than that, not much. There's already strict guidelines on gun storage, but people just don't do it. There's laws against shooting people, but people do it. This is clearly just a case of cultural problems, not legal problems.

I'd like to see gun restrictions loosened, but there's no way USA can deal with that in their current state.
<Faint> the rules have been stated quite clearly 3 times now from high staff
Your point is a good one, but I feel like just making people more responsible in general is a lot harder that it seems. And being less acceptant of irresponsible people affects the whole country in many ways and would be pretty expensive. I know that at present there are not many other solutions but I don't feel like your system is entirely sensible. Just because you make schemes to make a more trustworthy population doesn't mean that you should make it easier to get guns or that gun crime would stop. Although a greater concern for education and mental care would certainly not be a bad thing whatever the circumstance.
Good morning sweet princess
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
This is a societal and cultural problem

What are you referring to here? Just curious.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
So let's talk about the US. They have problems teaching even basic maths and literature, can they really handle teaching people to be responsible?

To be fair, math and literature is harder to learn than "Don't point that at people."

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
Is there anything to help? Sure, mental health registry, I know the liberals will scream discrimination, but handing guns to chronically depressed people isn't working out too well.

The way our gun laws are set up are as follows: If you are not a convicted felon, do not have a history of domestic violence, or do not have a debilitating mental condition, you are eligible to purchase and own a firearm. This includes chronically depressed people, but if that person is denied the right to own a gun, and is robbed, it might push that person over the edge, instead of that person owning a gun and being able to defend themselves and possibly gaining self confidence because of it.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
There's already strict guidelines on gun storage, but people just don't do it.

The only storage regulations are that they must either be kept in a locked case, or have a trigger lock on them. Everyone that I know does this, and most other people that I have seen also do this. Shooting ranges will not let you shoot unless you have everything locked up, so everyone that goes to a range does it. Please do not assume that most gun owners are irresponsible hicks.
All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’'s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.
Thinking about shootings and armed robberies, are they more often perpetrated by legal gun owners or illegal gun owners?

If it's by illegal gun owners (which I'm inclined to think it is), then clearly the law's ineffective. We need to look at why that is (I'm guessing it's to do with socioeconomic issues) and think of initiatives/policy to address the causes.
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
Is there anything to help? Sure, mental health registry, I know the liberals will scream discrimination, but handing guns to chronically depressed people isn't working out too well.

If you bothered to look up the liberal perspective on gun registry, you would see that liberals are the predominant political group in America who advocate using mental health as a denying factor for gun ownership. The major groups that outwardly have expressed that mental health should not be a factor with gun ownership have been libertarians or conservatives.

In fact, liberals are the most likely to advocate stricter gun registration and gun ownership laws based on medical and criminal history. It's one of the defining political standpoints of liberals in America. Don't take potshots at liberals if you're just going to be using a blanket generalization of "liberals lose their minds over any discrimination".


I'm not going to participate in this discussion any more than I have to, because it looks like the self-defense and self-confidence arguments are coming out and it's not worth my time trying to disprove emotions with the statistics. People just love to dismiss evidence in favor of anecdotes.
Last edited by Oracle; Nov 30, 2014 at 02:30 AM.
nyan :3
Youtube Channel i sometimes post videos of other games
Originally Posted by hawkesnightmare View Post
What are you referring to here? Just curious.

Does ownership of guns inherently make you a murderer? How come other countries can own guns and not have astronomical crime rates? This suggests it's a problem with the culture in USA.

Originally Posted by hawkesnightmare View Post
To be fair, math and literature is harder to learn than "Don't point that at people."

This is misleading, everyone knows you aren't supposed to point guns at people. There is a high number of accidental deaths, but the most amount of firearm related crime is most certainly on purpose.

Originally Posted by hawkesnightmare View Post
The way our gun laws are set up are as follows: If you are not a convicted felon, do not have a history of domestic violence, or do not have a debilitating mental condition, you are eligible to purchase and own a firearm. This includes chronically depressed people, but if that person is denied the right to own a gun, and is robbed, it might push that person over the edge, instead of that person owning a gun and being able to defend themselves and possibly gaining self confidence because of it.

Well that's not quite correct because different states have their own laws.

There's been quite a few cases where mentally ill people have purchased guns and then used them, either on themselves or others.

Originally Posted by hawkesnightmare View Post
The only storage regulations are that they must either be kept in a locked case, or have a trigger lock on them. Everyone that I know does this, and most other people that I have seen also do this. Shooting ranges will not let you shoot unless you have everything locked up, so everyone that goes to a range does it. Please do not assume that most gun owners are irresponsible hicks.

Again, depends on the state, and clearly the laws for your state are inadequate. Just having a trigger lock is not enough.

I would have said the bare minimum is to have to gun stored in a bolted down locked case, with ammo stored separately.

Originally Posted by protonitron View Post
Your point is a good one, but I feel like just making people more responsible in general is a lot harder that it seems. And being less acceptant of irresponsible people affects the whole country in many ways and would be pretty expensive. I know that at present there are not many other solutions but I don't feel like your system is entirely sensible. Just because you make schemes to make a more trustworthy population doesn't mean that you should make it easier to get guns or that gun crime would stop. Although a greater concern for education and mental care would certainly not be a bad thing whatever the circumstance.

Haha yes I agree, it's not an easy thing to do.

If someone is a criminal they can get a gun, even in countries with strict gun laws. USA isn't having problems because guns are easy to acquire, it's because they have a lot of people who are criminals.

Originally Posted by Ele View Post
Thinking about shootings and armed robberies, are they more often perpetrated by legal gun owners or illegal gun owners?

If it's by illegal gun owners (which I'm inclined to think it is), then clearly the law's ineffective. We need to look at why that is (I'm guessing it's to do with socioeconomic issues) and think of initiatives/policy to address the causes.

Sorry but if they are illegal gun owners, doesn't that mean they have broken the law already? How will adding more laws be effective?

Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
If you bothered to look up the liberal perspective on gun registry, you would see that liberals are the predominant political group in America who advocate using mental health as a denying factor for gun ownership. The major groups that outwardly have expressed that mental health should not be a factor with gun ownership have been libertarians or conservatives.

In fact, liberals are the most likely to advocate stricter gun registration and gun ownership laws based on medical and criminal history. It's one of the defining political standpoints of liberals in America. Don't take potshots at liberals if you're just going to be using a blanket generalization of "liberals lose their minds over any discrimination".

I didn't look up their official statement, I'm just going by what I see them post. Obviously liberals is quite a big group, I was referring to just some people who happen to be liberals.
<Faint> the rules have been stated quite clearly 3 times now from high staff