Originally Posted by
Boredpayne
The assertion that the specific groups are too dirty for their results to matter in the developed world is at best fundamentally misplaced due to the nature of the topic, and at worst outright bigoted.
What the
fuck
1.) Infections are more likely to occur with foreskin
2.) This shit seems to matter if you are unable to properly clean your dick (bacterial infections)
3.) This shit seems to matter if you are unable to properly protect your dick during sex (Sexually transmitted diseases)
4.) If you are unable to properly clean or protect your dick circumcision may seem like a legitimate option (Africa)
5.) If you have unlimited access to dick protecting and cleaning supplies such as condoms, water, and soap, the infection argument should not be used to justify circumcision
6.) In the U.S. (and western world) the infection argument is irrelevant.
Last edited by TheGod; Jan 6, 2015 at 10:52 AM.