Originally Posted by Hyde
Go back and re-read it because you missed a fair chunk of it. Please read before you post.
Uhh, no. I made a legit point. Respond to it.
"You are either intending to make a baby, or are using contraceptives. Contraceptives aren't perfect, leading to unwanted pregnancies, a consequence of casual sex. The legal contract that would exist in the case of abortion being illegal(except in certain circumstances) would require a woman to give birth."
That is what you said.
Last edited by Ele; Jul 21, 2015 at 06:10 AM.
Originally Posted by Ele
Uhh, no. I made a legit point. Respond to it.
"You are either intending to make a baby, or are using contraceptives. Contraceptives aren't perfect, leading to unwanted pregnancies, a consequence of casual sex. The legal contract that would exist in the case of abortion being illegal(except in certain circumstances) would require a woman to give birth."
That is what you said.
A similar legal contract forms every time you have sex consensually. You are either intending to make a baby, or are using contraceptives. Contraceptives aren't perfect, leading to unwanted pregnancies, a consequence of casual sex. The legal contract that would exist in the case of abortion being illegal(except in certain circumstances) would require a woman to give birth. A similar contract occurs when a man has sex, requiring the man to provide for the child regardless of whether or not the man wants to. It's a legally binding principle designed to preserve morality and a decent quality of life for the child.
In the case that abortion is allowed, both parties are free to escape from their legal obligations.
It's like you're purposely avoiding reading things
Hoss.
No, it isn't.
If two parties consent to sex, a contract is established that the male will support the child(child support) regardless of whether or not a child is the intended result of sex. A woman's obligations extend further than that in various other forms. That's how contracts work. Action -> Legally binding consequence.
If a woman has a child, she has 2 choices. Put it up for adoption or assume the responsibility of a parent and take care of it. An abortion serves as an escape clause for both parties. It isn't a fabrication or an exaggeration, that's just how it works.
If two parties consent to sex, a contract is established that the male will support the child(child support) regardless of whether or not a child is the intended result of sex. A woman's obligations extend further than that in various other forms. That's how contracts work. Action -> Legally binding consequence.
If a woman has a child, she has 2 choices. Put it up for adoption or assume the responsibility of a parent and take care of it. An abortion serves as an escape clause for both parties. It isn't a fabrication or an exaggeration, that's just how it works.
Hoss.
Originally Posted by Hyde
No, it isn't.
If two parties consent to sex...
If a woman has a child...
Pick one. There's no responsibility to support a child that's never born. Abortion removes that responsibility. That's my whole point. People are more accepting of abortions nowadays. It's not such a sin to 'avoid accountability' and decide, for whatever reason, to have an abortion. We're living in a world where 'having unprotected sex = must have a child' is no longer true.
