Originally Posted by nikosefs
map
Oh my god! first time I'm seeing a real clear word. Really Thank you! 'o'
Someone used "Syrian Rebels" which isn't equal to ISIS. Is this a dream or something? Or partisan media couldn't work enough?
-In my opinion WW3 appeared when big countries started Perception Operation by Media to keep their people ineffective and in fear. Somehow it works. Now every nation has a different perspective. And each country have to convince their people that they are right to keep doing what they are doing...
-USA for example, People eat, work, sleep, live they can't touch anything else. They cant judge their government. Something makes them think "Whatever government does is right".
-Maybe Russia? Why no one ask what the hell are we looking for in Syria?
-Or Israel? Whole nation is ok with their army to be bully, kill civilians and take over another country?
Can you see how they are all under control? They only believe what they feel better about, only see what they care about.
-After explosions in France and Germany they were all against the terror. Like, really? You guys were supporting terrorists in Turkey? When it comes to other countries everyone stays quiet as the world didn't talk about explosions in Turkey and Azerbaijan. People also died there? Who cares huh?But if its their own countries they shout their asses of. It hurts more when its close right?
-So don't believe what you read. Don't believe what your President says. Think it first. If every single person reads, watches, thinks from "every possible angle" and then chose 'the most realistic' one instead of 'what they like to see' there's no need for war. Just some need war to control us, to let us stuck in fear, to take over cities, to take other cities' wealth.
Leon The Black
Originally Posted by IBlackleon
Oh my god! first time I'm seeing a real clear word. Really Thank you! 'o'
do you even understand why i put that map there?
Originally Posted by IBlackleon
Someone used "Syrian Rebels" which isn't equal to ISIS. Is this a dream or something? Or partisan media couldn't work enough?
that someone is wikipedia
Originally Posted by nikosefs
also here's a wiki article about who is involved and who supports who
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreig...rian_Civil_War
map
Originally Posted by IBlackleon
-In my opinion WW3 appeared when big countries started Perception Operation by Media to keep their people ineffective and in fear. Somehow it works. Now every nation has a different perspective. And each country have to convince their people that they are right to keep doing what they are doing...
-USA for example, People eat, work, sleep, live they can't touch anything else. They cant judge their government. Something makes them think "Whatever government does is right".
-Maybe Russia? Why no one ask what the hell are we looking for in Syria?
-Or Israel? Whole nation is ok with their army to be bully, kill civilians and take over another country?
Can you see how they are all under control? They only believe what they feel better about, only see what they care about.
-After explosions in France and Germany they were all against the terror. Like, really? You guys were supporting terrorists in Turkey? When it comes to other countries everyone stays quiet as the world didn't talk about explosions in Turkey and Azerbaijan. People also died there? Who cares huh?But if its their own countries they shout their asses of. It hurts more when its close right?
-So don't believe what you read. Don't believe what your President says. Think it first. If every single person reads, watches, thinks from "every possible angle" and then chose 'the most realistic' one instead of 'what they like to see' there's no need for war. Just some need war to control us, to let us stuck in fear, to take over cities, to take other cities' wealth.
you are completely off-subject or you need to make your statements
better to understand.
Last edited by nikosefs; Apr 7, 2016 at 02:52 PM.
Originally Posted by nikosefs
do you even understand why i put that map there?
that someone is wikipedia
you are completely off-subject or you need to make your statements
better to understand.
I know why you put the map there but 'syrian rebel' is a word that may stop some people to think that Turkey is supporting isis. Turkey supports "Syrian Rebels" and Turkmen Mujahids in the area. "This would completely affect it if there was a war." Just stated that it is a right word...
For the world war i said that WW3 will not happen because War is to control other countries and have rights on them. And these are being done in other ways like Controlling Media, selling people fake freedom and safety... Because these stuff affects people more than war. its not too off-subject is it?
Leon The Black
Originally Posted by IBlackleon
I know why you put the map there but 'syrian rebel' is a word that may stop some people to think that Turkey is supporting isis. Turkey supports "Syrian Rebels" and Turkmen Mujahids in the area. "This would completely affect it if there was a war." Just stated that it is a right word...
For the world war i said that WW3 will not happen because War is to control other countries and have rights on them. And these are being done in other ways like Controlling Media, selling people fake freedom and safety... Because these stuff affects people more than war. its not too off-subject is it?
The map is just extremely simplified that's all. There are a lot of forces inside Syria like Al Qaeda, FSA, ISIS, Hezbollah, Al-Nusra, IF, Kurds, etc, all fighting each other and fighting within. Outside forces may or may not be fighting each group individually.
<Faint> the rules have been stated quite clearly 3 times now from high staff
A generation that has never experienced war is trying to draw parallels just so they can make the world a little bit more exciting.
If there was a third world war you'd know about it, what we have right now is merely international conflicts, the stuff you never really hear about from the history books because it's insignificant.
It's overshadowed by World War 2/1 and other global events.
What we're seeing today is no world war. It is barely a war.
If anyone disagrees, then explain to me the need to call this a World War 3?
Why not just discuss the conflicts individually, or address them in unison like normal people do?
It's because you want that label there, and it's stupid.
Not directed at anyone above.
If there was a third world war you'd know about it, what we have right now is merely international conflicts, the stuff you never really hear about from the history books because it's insignificant.
It's overshadowed by World War 2/1 and other global events.
What we're seeing today is no world war. It is barely a war.
If anyone disagrees, then explain to me the need to call this a World War 3?
Why not just discuss the conflicts individually, or address them in unison like normal people do?
It's because you want that label there, and it's stupid.
Not directed at anyone above.
PM me with any and all questions
