alright well this is my last attempt because im genuinely stumped on this lol

case 1: yes the accused is guilty because he specifically said yes to arranging both the murders of Alexander and George.

case 2: no, eBay's terms of conditions say that bidding on a car is not a binding contract therefore he shouldn't be obligated to follow up.

case 3: no because both seller and buyer agreed on a toyota and in this case the seller breached their contract by giving the buyer a toy yoda instead.

case 4: yes because alexander sent the company owner a signed letter stating that he will work for the company for $10,000 annually for 2 years. alexander didn't even recieve the rejection letter yet before accepting a job offer for the company in Japan so if this went to court alexander would probably lose.

case 5: i'm going to say no for this one. my reasoning is because this case is probably in favor of the seller and he can pull out of a sale at any point. he never really intended to sell the house at all and even if there was a written contract signed by both mr and mrs alexander it doesn't help george's case because both of them were drunk. this case doesn't meet all the requirements to have a binding contract between both of them.