Originally Posted by
mWah
do one for tom and it’s about the same graph, the only difference is he arguably fought more dangerous opps, most dangerous dude tom fought was curtis blaydes and he got ko by him previously regardless. tom fought a 45 year old and less decorated opps
based on the timeline were there other contenders during that time that jon should have fought in place of the opp he did?
let’s not pretend some of the best mma fighters at most times are 30+, the dude just started his career early against better opps
most of aspinalls early opps are also old or cans, his first real fight at 21 he fought a 36 y/o the point is kinda moot
good boy, so neither aspinall or jon boner jones are the goat of mma so we agree