Originally Posted by Boredpayne
Jim: certain individual state laws hold that marriage can be between homosexuals, hence why it is included as a valid definition in the dictionary.
But I digress, the debate is more over what the definition should be than what it is.
Federal law overrules state laws where the two are in conflict (Prigg v Pennsylvania).
As for the topic, agreed, but the way you handled arguing with Hyde like that was objectively, factually, incorrect, thus why I intervened.
Anyways, I cbf'ed gathering from your wall of texts what you believe should happen to the law. So what's your opinion?
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»