I suppose theres some cultural aspect to this which I may not understand.

But shouldn't they understand the secrecy needed to carry out the operation? Even if Pakistan were actually against him, the point of pride in "If he's in our land, we'll deal with it" is somewhat childish pride. If they found him first, they could have him killed.

And now they want to kick out NATO and drones over this. It's hard to not say they're being childish or are actually helping terrorism.

Can anyone else think of any other possibilities that are capable of explaining Pakistan's current stance WITHOUT putting them in league with terrorism? And capable of explaining their subsequent actions?

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapc...den/index.html

(Please stay on topic/question. Saying Pakistan is terrorist is off-topic)