Looks like the seal team 6 squad that took out bin laden is 'dead'.(the 'dead' part means that I think that they were just given passports and sent to different countries, being declared as dead, so no one would harm them or their families, quite a large sacrifice.)
Call in the tactical nukes, osama bin laden has struck from the dead.
Perhaps Osama was never killed in the first place, and was just given passports and sent to different countries, being declared as dead, so no one would harm him or his family, quite a large sacrifice.
That would have happened much sooner, if at all. 10 years since that dreadful day, and 12 years since the last attempt at his life, the tomohawk missle during the clinton administration. The SEALs and their families were obviously targets of the terror groups. The story just does not add up. Squad Team Six in chinooks?
Please stop trolling. I am very offended by the fact that you compared a lot of brave men and women and their families to a fucking cunt like bin laden. You are trying to provoke me to cuss you out by being ignorant and attacking such a touchy issue. There is a ton of emotion involved with it, and you are just one of those people who enjoy fueling it. I'm restricting my language, and you should know by now about what I think of you.
That would have happened much sooner, if at all. 10 years since that dreadful day, and 12 years since the last attempt at his life, the tomohawk missle during the clinton administration. The SEALs and their families were obviously targets of the terror groups. The story just does not add up. Squad Team Six in chinooks?
Please stop trolling. I am very offended by the fact that you compared a lot of brave men and women and their families to a fucking cunt like bin laden. You are trying to provoke me to cuss you out by being ignorant and attacking such a touchy issue. There is a ton of emotion involved with it, and you are just one of those people who enjoy fueling it. I'm restricting my language, and you should know by now about what I think of you.
Firstly, Bin Laden only took responsibility for 9/11 in 03, so take that in to consideration.
You call America malevolent. These people(terrorists) go out there with the intention to murder as many as possible. US troops do not go out to the field thinking "I'ma kill me as many of them muslim 'terrorists' as possible". US troops actually hope to entirely avoid conflict. Would you want some crazy idiots running at you holding 5 gernades with the pins on their pinkies? America has good intentions, in terms of allowing the people to 'have a choice'. Osama Bin Laden was not only behind a single attack. He funded every single attack on innocence that has ever been taken by Al Qaeda. Talk about malevolent intentions.
Secondly, I don't make a distinction between the life of an Iraq civilian, and their families, and the life of an American civilian, and their families.
I don't either. But when you set rules into place, and they don't follow them in a warzone, they die. Would anyone else give us less of a restriction?
I am offended that you seem to think of them as lower than dirt, and you don't even flinch that nearly a million civilians were slaughtered by US forces in their hunt for Bin Laden.
A million seems to be a number that you just pulled out of your ass. Civilian casualties and insurgent kills fall into a similar category, and sometimes, are unable to be distinguished. Also, 'slaughtered' does not seem like a good work to describe civilian deaths in the hunt for Bin Laden.
Your American culture disgusts me, in that you could even think of treating people this way. And that you would think that anyone who disagrees with you is a troll. Truly you are the ignorant one, defending your pathetic and despicable barbarian country instead of admitting the problems and striving for change.
Why do you assume the military has anything to do with american culture? Treating people in what way, per say? You are not a troll for disagreeing with me, you are a troll for disagreeing with me with the intent of being an insensitive asshole.
Before you call someone a 'fucking cunt' for killing a few civilians, you should consider that your government has killed more than a thousand times as many in revenge, surely they have their pound of flesh.
One person with malevolent intentions, and an established institution wishing to protect its citizens are two very different things. Bin Laden's motives were sheerly to cause death. Ours were not.
You call America malevolent. These people(terrorists) go out there with the intention to murder as many as possible. US troops do not go out to the field thinking "I'ma kill me as many of them muslim 'terrorists' as possible". US troops actually hope to entirely avoid conflict. Would you want some crazy idiots running at you holding 5 gernades with the pins on their pinkies? America has good intentions, in terms of allowing the people to 'have a choice'. Osama Bin Laden was not only behind a single attack. He funded every single attack on innocence that has ever been taken by Al Qaeda. Talk about malevolent intentions.
America has selfish blood thirsty intentions, nothing more than that.
Al Qaeda has a political agenda that I don't think I should have to explain to you, you should read it by yourself rather than just saying "omg al qeeda just want to kill people"
I don't either. But when you set rules into place, and they don't follow them in a warzone, they die. Would anyone else give us less of a restriction?
Actually the US does not recognize Iraq as a war-zone, which is why they did use carpet bombing and torture. They literally had no restrictions, they recognized the entirety of Iraq as being hostile.
A million seems to be a number that you just pulled out of your ass. Civilian casualties and insurgent kills fall into a similar category, and sometimes, are unable to be distinguished. Also, 'slaughtered' does not seem like a good work to describe civilian deaths in the hunt for Bin Laden.
Slaughtered is the correct term, how is multimillion dollar gunships and drones even slightly comparable to a few national guard armed with ancient AKs? No Hyde, slaughter is highly accurate.
Why do you assume the military has anything to do with american culture? Treating people in what way, per say? You are not a troll for disagreeing with me, you are a troll for disagreeing with me with the intent of being an insensitive asshole.
Yes, because Americans supporting (and laughably trying to justify) their military actions is not cultural... Nice try!
One person with malevolent intentions, and an established institution wishing to protect its citizens are two very different things. Bin Laden's motives were sheerly to cause death. Ours were not.
"Wishing to protect its citizens" haha. The US's actions had nothing to do with protection, they actively invaded several countries, they didn't move to peacefully settle the disagreement. Once again you try to propagate the myth that Al Queda's goal was simply to kill people...