Secret Santa 2024
Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post
Military age =/= in the military.

There is conscription in Syria. Military age men are either in the military or are deserting. I just realized you don't have the slightest idea of how the world works, please, just grab a book or something.
I don't really know much about the situations the could be refugees are facing in the middle east, but I feel like you are treating cowardice as having a worse meaning than it does. Not being willing to die for the greater good, and fleeing as far away as possible to a country where you aren't wanted or needed could fit the definition of a coward.

I would probably do the same, and I feel like a lot of my friends probably would as well I don't really mind that. Obviously I'm a little doubtful that shooting people trying to illegally cross the border is the right think to do, but again, I don't understand the situation in the middle east, so I can't really argue either way.
-----
Originally Posted by ynvaser View Post
There is conscription in Syria. Military age men are either in the military or are deserting. I just realized you don't have the slightest idea of how the world works, please, just grab a book or something.

If you could try to hold back on insulting those who disagree with you, then you might actually be able to persuade some people that you are not a hypocritical, blood thirsty, social darwinian fascist and actually advance the discussion. Please don't antagonise people for not knowing something that you do. If we all knew the same things as each other then we would not have to discuss why we think what we do because it would be almost entirely identical save for small philosophical differences.
Last edited by Zelda; Apr 13, 2016 at 09:18 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Good morning sweet princess
Originally Posted by ynvaser View Post
There is conscription in Syria. Military age men are either in the military or are deserting. I just realized you don't have the slightest idea of how the world works, please, just grab a book or something.

There was 1 innacuracy in my post, does that make my point invalid? No, since it was the most minor part of my argument. Does it make you any more in the right, or make your position any less disgraceful in terms of morals and actually feeling empathy towards other humans? No. Does it make me not shocked at your total disregard of others free will and human rights? No.

Instead of picking out innacurracies that link to only a tiny amount of the post and not answering the point I was making, which is that refugees are in a horrible position and have every right to leave the country, and in doing so take their families to safety.


And youre not in a position to tell anyone how the world works since you boldly made an entrance to this thread by saying "Kill the migrants" - meaning indiscriminantly. You genuinely suggested that a parrallel to genocide was the solution to the issue.
Last edited by SmallBowl; Apr 14, 2016 at 01:13 AM.
Don't dm me pictures of bowls that you find attractive.
Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post
There was 1 innacuracy in my post, does that make my point invalid?

But that is your entire argument!
They are running away from a war they are lawfully obligated to fight in. It makes all the points you make which boil down to "boohoo poor refugees" null and void.
In every society, people have rights and duties. You have no rights if you run away from your duties.
In wartime, punishment for desertion is death, even in some Western countries.

Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post
Does it make you any more in the right, or make your position any less disgraceful in terms of morals and actually feeling empathy towards other humans?

There is no place for empathy when it comes to global events. You have to put aside your individualism for the good of the many. The 20-something scum you see pouring over the fences are either here to kill people or because they are cowards. I couldn't give two less shits about their feelings, and I'd rather see them dead if it means we catch ISIS's sleeper agents. The ones that have nothing to hide (eg. fathers with their families) will come and apply for refuge through official channels. Although they should have done that in Greece, not halfway through the Schengen Zone in Hungary or Austria.

I believe I gave proper counter-points to the argument you keep trying to make in this post and the previous ones. You can't justify any of the things these people are doing. You being shocked by a down-to-earth opinion is your own problem, not a proper counter-argument.

Originally Posted by Zelda View Post
Not being willing to die for the greater good, and fleeing as far away as possible to a country where you aren't wanted or needed could fit the definition of a coward.
I would probably do the same, and I feel like a lot of my friends probably would as well I don't really mind that.

Yeah, you'd have a tough time if you ran into cops along the way, or if your target country decided to deport you home (what the Hungarian government is doing with illegal border crossers).
Last edited by ynvaser; Apr 14, 2016 at 01:10 PM.
Originally Posted by ynvaser View Post
But that is your entire argument!
They are running away from a war they are lawfully obligated to fight in. It makes all the points you make which boil down to "boohoo poor refugees" null and void.
In every society, people have rights and duties. You have no rights if you run away from your duties.
In wartime, punishment for desertion is death, even in some Western countries.


There is no place for empathy when it comes to global events. You have to put aside your individualism for the good of the many. The 20-something scum you see pouring over the fences are either here to kill people or because they are cowards. I couldn't give two less shits about their feelings, and I'd rather see them dead if it means we catch ISIS's sleeper agents. The ones that have nothing to hide (eg. fathers with their families) will come and apply for refuge through official channels. Although they should have done that in Greece, not halfway through the Schengen Zone in Hungary or Austria.

I believe I gave proper counter-points to the argument you keep trying to make in this post and the previous ones. You can't justify any of the things these people are doing. You being shocked by a down-to-earth opinion is your own problem, not a proper counter-argument.


Yeah, you'd have a tough time if you ran into cops along the way, or if your target country decided to deport you home (what the Hungarian government is doing with illegal border crossers).

Are you sure you know what a human right is?

There is absolutely always room for empathy, its interesting that you seem to be disagreeing with all the global leaders, with the exception of perhaps Trump (Edit: Yes I know he is a presidential candidate not a president yet - before you decide to JUST pick out this part of the post and ignore the rest, but the point stands) who is being increasingly shown to be Hitler's parallel. You have no conception of the place these people have left, who are you to decide they should have thrown their lives away meaninglessly? Why should they want to throw themselves to their death? Seems pretty rational to not want to imo. I guess you see differently and think they should all just run mindlessly to their death.

You did not give proper counter points, what you gave was a fascist regime comparable to genocide with no regard for human rights or human life.

And if you seriously think your argument of killing all the migrants is "down to Earth" you need rethink your view of what that phrase means.
Last edited by SmallBowl; Apr 14, 2016 at 02:42 PM.
Don't dm me pictures of bowls that you find attractive.
I gave you every counter point necessary and all you do is yell "fascist! " and pretend to have the moral high ground. I don't think you have the moral high ground, is that the counter-point you'd like to hear?
Also, "Trump = Hitler" lol.

Bring some facts to the table, nobody is subject to your own values and morals.
You gave no counter points other than "I DONT APPLY EMPATHY TO GLOBAL SITUATIONS BECAUSE IM RIGHT OK"

And no thats not the counter point I'd like to hear since youre not countering any point :| - in case youre confused what I would actually quite like to hear is you pipe up and actually defend the fact you want to kill all migrants or admit that its ridiculous.

I also gave a perfectly valid reason that you are arguing from a fascist standpoint - you said the solution was to kill all the migrants. If you cant see that morally speaking I am in the high-ground, unless youre 6 or less, thats extremely worrying. Not understanding that being in the point of empathy and taking sympathy and giving refuge to refugees is more morally straight than shooting all the migrants in the face is horrendous.

There are lots of parallels between Trump and Hitler:
Example 1:
-Trump stated that he would consider requiring Muslim Americans to carry special identification cards that mark their faith. And also stated that he would definitely have a database of Muslim Americans

-The Nazis made the Jews wear a gold star of David on their clothes.


If you search it youll find lots of places making a connection between them, and a bunch more connections, a few newspapers have done it too.

The Trump Hitler comparison is genuinely pretty famous, Im quite surprised you havent seen it before at all...



Ok a fact for you: all the known attackers in both the Paris and Brussels attacks were EU citizens.
Last edited by SmallBowl; Apr 14, 2016 at 05:51 PM.
Don't dm me pictures of bowls that you find attractive.
Nobody say anything else about the trump-hitler comparison ok? It is irrelevant, and when it comes to morally charged dilemmas like this one, politicians will tend to go with the least radical choice rather than considering what is best in the long run. Nobody is going to blame them for a terrorist attack with more than 30 deaths because they don't shoot illegal immigrants, but if even one child was shot in the arms of a father trying to cross the border then that would be their career over.

And Ynvaser, I feel like bowls does have the moral high ground with this one, but that doesn't necessarily mean he is right.

You are both portraying the situation in Syria very differently. Although it is ridiculous to ask for sources on something so general, I feel like it might be worth considering to prevent the discussion turning into an endurance match of "no it isn't", "yes it is".
-----
So Ynvaser, are you talking having police search for illegal immigrants who have already got past the border and then shooting them? Or do you just mean having armed guards on the border instructed to shoot at anyone trying to get across? Because until now I had assumed the latter, but with all the accusations of genocide I'm beginning to feel like not everyone is interpreting your posts that way.
Last edited by Zelda; Apr 14, 2016 at 08:36 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Good morning sweet princess
Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post
defend the fact you want to kill all migrants or admit that its ridiculous.

Originally Posted by Zelda View Post
...do you just mean having armed guards on the border instructed to shoot at anyone trying to get across? Because until now I had assumed the latter, but with all the accusations of genocide I'm beginning to feel like not everyone is interpreting your posts that way.

I don't advocate genocide. A migrant isn't an ethnic group, it's a term. Smallbowl just tries to paint the devil on the wall, and is obsessed with the idea that I'm an arm-swinging neonazi.

If it wasn't clear already, I'd like to shoot the migrants that illegally cross the border, AT the border. Have guards at the border, make watchtowers at a reasonable density guarding the fence. Have them warn people who approach the fence that they either turn back or face the consequences. After repeated warnings, lethal force should be authorized. This ensures the safety of the guardsmen and deters people from trying their luck.
Ones that slip by the fence could be caught and detained by patrols, or if they resist, same as above.
This is how border control used to work at the Berlin Wall or between Austria and Hungary during the Cold War. I'm not an expert on the US-Mexico border, but I'd imagine it's similar.
(Smallbowl, before you start whining, just because it was implemented by dictatorship doesn't undermine their efficiency. Look up how many people managed to slip by the Berlin Wall during it's operation, it's not a whole lot.)

Originally Posted by Zelda View Post
So Ynvaser, are you talking having police search for illegal immigrants who have already got past the border and then shooting them?

Ofc not. Resistance/non-compliance is the only thing that causes a policeman to escalate a situation. If they catch an illegal, they detain them even in the current system.


Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post
Ok a fact for you: all the known attackers in both the Paris and Brussels attacks were EU citizens.

Oh, really?
(The guy is Belgian all right, but look at the rest of what he was saying)

Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post
Trump stated that he would consider requiring Muslim Americans to carry special identification cards that mark their faith. And also stated that he would definitely have a database of Muslim Americans

FDR = Hitler confirmed.
Last edited by ynvaser; Apr 14, 2016 at 09:24 PM.
I said to Zelda I wouldnt reply again because this discussion isnt going to go anywhere, so this will be my last post here.

Originally Posted by ynvaser View Post
I don't advocate genocide. A migrant isn't an ethnic group, it's a term. Smallbowl just tries to paint the devil on the wall, and is obsessed with the idea that I'm an arm-swinging neonazi.

First off I said "a parallel to genocide" which is what it seemed like you were suggesting. I'll give you the posts that made it suggest that you wanted to kill all the military age migrants.

By the way Im definitely not the only one who thought you were supporting a genocide parallel.
Originally Posted by ynvaser
The 20-something scum you see pouring over the fences are either here to kill people or because they are cowards. I couldn't give two less shits about their feelings, and I'd rather see them dead if it means we catch ISIS's sleeper agents.

Originally Posted by ynvaser
In every society, people have rights and duties. You have no rights if you run away from your duties.
In wartime, punishment for desertion is death, even in some Western countries.

http://forum.toribash.com/showpost.p...7&postcount=66

This is what I was arguing agaisnt, and Im sure you can see how what you meant could easily be misconstrued to mean what I thought it meant.
Originally Posted by ynvaser
Oh, really?
(The guy is Belgian all right, but look at the rest of what he was saying)


FDR = Hitler confirmed.

Daily mail hm not the most reputable of sources but ok, I see your point here.

At the same time, he says around 90 others passed through with him, this number is likely to be vastly inflated to spread fear, he is a terrorist after all.

Now, just like you I of course do not want to see another terrorist attack like those of Paris and Brussels, however the innocent death toll for those 2 attacks combined was ~160, the number of migrants entering Europe is estimated to be over 1,800,000, the BBC uses the term migrant to mean people who have entered and have not yet completed the legal process of claiming asylum. I could not find the number of military age men, but Im sure we can both safely agree that it will be powers above the number of deaths from the Parris and Brussels attacks, these are people that want to live peacefully in Europe and these are the people you would be sanctioning to kill?



Now, I also see your counterpoint with FDR, but its not the same. FDR was president at a time when the USA was at war with the Japanese, in comparison, we are not a war with "the Muslims" we are at war with ISIL.
Don't dm me pictures of bowls that you find attractive.