Originally Posted by Mister616
Ahem. What points?
That I'm a science minded person?
I'm an athiest. There are not many people who are as scientifically minded as athiests. Do you know why? Because we have never seen ANY evidence EVER that proves that there is a god. You, on the other hand, completely dismiss an eye-witness account. The firefighter was in the damn wreckage. He saw the metal, THERE ARE PHOTOS ON THE WEBSITE of the firefighters gathered around the hole.
As for eyewitness accounts regarding the Pentagon attack:
As Doublefort had previously stated, the FBI confiscated all video footage that recorded the impact on The Pentagon.
Therefore, all we have to rely upon ARE eyewitness accounts.
izar in joor post, maeking gramer correcshuns
words in red are unneeded.
letters and words in bold were fixed.
Might I say that, for a scientifically minded atheist, your grammar is HORRIBLE.
<insert (something) here>
Originally Posted by Mister616
Fine. You people want proof?
Five to six days after 9/11, pools of molten metal were found beneath the towers. Five to six days.
Now, everyone says that the support beams in the towers did not have to break or melt, only bend. Because jetfuel will not burn hot enought to melt structural steel. So they say that it bent and snapped.
So why the molten metal? If the jet fuel was only hot enough to bend the steel, why did it melt? Why did the 9/11 commision report not even mention the molten metal?
Don't tell me that there wasn't any.
http://www.infowars.net/articles/nov...1106molten.htm
This man was THERE. He was a firefighter at Ground Zero.
Watch his video.
Thank you. I offer no explanation as to why the fires burned for weeks after the collapse. That said, are we positive that it was melted steel and not melted aluminum alloys from the plane? Furthermore,
Originally Posted by NIST
Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing.
Originally Posted by Clbck
Thank you. I offer no explanation as to why the fires burned for weeks after the collapse. That said, are we positive that it was melted steel and not melted aluminum alloys from the plane? Furthermore,
I fail to see how alloys from the plane could burn for weeks underground. There was no oxygen under there.
I'd like to see Hulk get so pissed that he exits his physical body.
Instead of being powered by psychic energy or whatever, he's powered by ARRRGH FUCK YOU
Instead of being powered by psychic energy or whatever, he's powered by ARRRGH FUCK YOU
Originally Posted by Mister616
I fail to see how alloys from the plane could burn for weeks underground. There was no oxygen under there.
You don't need oxygen for heat to be present. A crayon will melt if it is exposed to temperatures just above 128 degrees, regardless if oxygen is present or not. The same concept can be applied to metal.
<insert (something) here>
Anyways, for Atheists to just have a one-track mind of no higher being at all and not willing to compromise is just i don't know how to say this without being retarded oh fuck it the no child left behind act and sleepiness is getting to me. It's dumb and rather i would keep an open mind to any new ideas. *passes out*
