Toribash
No, you're a scammer and you have three separate banned accounts.

Not only that, but you're stupid enough to use the same username every time you make an alt.
back from the dead
oribash is such a great way to make some additional money too, so I use it to feed myself and
get drugs / weed or simply buy some stuff for my GF.

lolwut
ally invade

Originally Posted by Kabreto3 View Post
Oyster, I'm not stupid. If we'd take some IQ tests or something, I believe, I'd win.

BAHAHAHAHAH.

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
omg galt I missed you babe


Also, the implication of morality being a societal construct is that it ceases to carry meaning once you acknowledge it. Maybe the real question is "Is morality necessary for the survival of humanity as a species?".

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
I was talking about morality as societal construct, and as (mostly) usual I agree with you on the necessity of morality for the whole.

However, the individual does not require morality to maintain a high standard of living so as long as a large majority (at least 70% or so) of the population recognizes and abides by a common moral standard.

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
Morality (to me, at least) is entirely subjective and changes based on the society you are a member of.

Morality is any societal construct that relies on the obedience and adherence to moral law by the individual for the benefit of the whole.

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
Oh, mah bad.

A moral act is any act which benefits the society who imposes the moral law that the moral act follows.

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
hahah moral economics

Galt- following your own standard of self-benefiting morals is amoral because morality itself is derived from both defined and implied societal constraints.

(by my definition)

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
Society.

Morality isn't necessary for hermits because there isn't anything sentient to help or harm.

However, when societies came about (and I consider more than one individual acting together as

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
a group to be a society), the establishment of common mores became necessary to ensure the survival and continued progression of the whole.

See what I'm gettin' at? Also, get on IRC in about 8 hours.

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
auch

you were there but didn't respond

also, self-preservation =/= morality
species preservation = morality

Originally Posted by Oyster View Post
Then you're defining morality as self-preservation, whereas I'm defining it as the preservation of a species (you can't murder or steal from yourself, both of which fall under common moral law set by society). Morality exists to ensure the continued existence of the human race, not the existence of individual humans.


Yup. Oyster's really stupid isn't he. You're soooooo much more intelligent than he, for sure.

/invade
[doc]
IQ tests aren't always a good test of immediate knowledge anyway. Or at least from what I've seen.
Omnia Mori
sed Evici Amor