Originally Posted by
MKSax
i agree
u little children talking everytime about nuclears...
using nuclear power in wars is illegal for ur kind info and if anyone uses it then that nation gets disrespectfull among other nations
and aircraft are the things which are fast fling things which will crush ur ass with bombs and guns when u were aiming at land 
yeah true...england is a small country and if it attacks U.S.then they will commit a suicide
What.
The.
Fuck.
There are so many wrong with all of these statements. Nuclear weapons are not illegal, breaking the non-proliferation treaty is illegal. Actually it's not even "illegal," there's no real code of law governing international interactions. Laws are set up by individual governments and as such the term illegal can't even be used here.
Countries will not lose respect for other countries because they use nuclear weapons. It is a drastic step, nothing more. Nuclear weapons are far more dangerous than aircraft, but not as relevant because they have only been used in war twice and are unlikely to be used again.
Also no, England would not attack the U.S. Absolutely not. And if they did, the whole EU would do it with them, so the U.S. would in fact be obliterated. Why are you even ranking superpowers by their military capability? Canada and Australia don't have the military capabilities of the U.S., but why should that matter? They are both highly developed first world countries with large populations. Only a child would rank countries based on their ability to kill others.
Originally Posted by
4zb41
Unfortunately I think the U.S.A. would try their darndest to murder the crap out of any other rising superpowers or at least Ally with them and have policies which keep the other country from growing bigger than they are. Hell, they might even invade and conquer them if they had to.
As mentioned earlier however, China does not have to put up with this problem. This is because they are extremely useful to the US (and other countries)because they have a vast and cheap workforce to manufacture things for them. This would mean that without China, the economy would effectively collapse for practically everyone (maybe a bit exaggerated?). And so China grows and climbs the ladder and the US can't (or won't) do anything about it.
When China approaches the US in terms of power, I think the US will want to do something about it, but can't for fear of the consequences of hostile actions (China has nukes) and I think we'll all agree that an alliance between the US and the Chinese is nigh impossible. If anything it's the Chinese that will take action. For all we know they don't care about the US - the US doesn't make much for them right? All the US would be to China is a giant threat. And Russia would probably support China if they were to take actions against the US too.
Also, I think Russia would become the next #1 superpower if something awful were to happen to the US right now, at this moment in time.
Over time with no horrific events however, I continue to believe it would be China.
What.
I'm sorry, did you just say the U.S. might invade and conquer countries that threaten to rise above it in influence? I can't even explain why that's irrational without breaking into chuckles. The rest of your post is based on that ridiculous premise, so I'm skipping through it.
Originally Posted by
4zb41
^Then again England (as a country) would be much more easily disposed of with a nuclear strike than the US, China or Russia. Unfortunately :|
Size of a country now determines how much a nuclear strike would damage it. Prepare your bunkers everyone, Canada is about to take over the world.
Originally Posted by
wwolfer
fuck the aircraft,nuke is all in todays world._.
russia will,they took over tb tho
Russia's military abilities and numbers are beneath both the U.S. and China. Comparing toribash to the global population is nonsensical.
This thread needs serious help.
Edit: Oh, and how could we forget Moscow? Are they going to secede from Russia, conquer it, and rise as the next superpower?
