Toribash
Originally Posted by Boredpayne View Post
Why are you even ranking superpowers by their military capability? Canada and Australia don't have the military capabilities of the U.S., but why should that matter? They are both highly developed first world countries with large populations. Only a child would rank countries based on their ability to kill others.

I agree wholeheartedly with the bolded statement.

Alice Lyman Miller (Professor of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School), defines a superpower as "a country that has the capacity to project dominating power and influence anywhere in the world, and sometimes, in more than one region of the globe at a time, and so may plausibly attain the status of global hegemony."

A superpower could conceivably be purely economic, or via the respect and agreement of others.

Currently China is a superpower, as they have massive economical control.

Other countries, such as the Saudi Arabia for oil, and Australia for raw minerals, could be considered superpowers for control of resources.

The UN, although not a country, can be likened to a superpower due to its global influence. An optimist may say that the UN could create a hegemony, and thus create a United Earth, rather than splintered and forever bickering countries.


Wiki names several 'potential' superpowers;

Brazil, China, EU, India and Russia.
Last edited by Gormen; Jan 20, 2011 at 08:38 AM.
Originally Posted by Gormen View Post
I agree wholeheartedly with the bolded statement.

But you'd be naive to think that the size of a country's military, or the those of their allies, is irrelevant.
[02:19] <Dr_Strangelove> nearly 3 hours of nobody saying a word
[02:19] * Tamer0 is now known as TamerAfk
[02:19] <Dr_Strangelove> gg toribash
[02:19] <+hampa> gg
NO ONE.
MERRICUH

User infracted for this post~ Hyde
Last edited by Hyde; Jan 23, 2011 at 07:52 PM.
Mosier: tl;dr gay clothing thoughts
Originally Posted by Dr_Strangelove View Post
But you'd be naive to think that the size of a country's military, or the those of their allies, is irrelevant.

I didn't say that.

But rating countries from best to worst by military strength is childish.

C'mon Stranger, be an idealist for a second and stop being a realist/cynic. Wouldn't it be nice?
India.

There is a documentary on it aswell or what ever. With some good points. I'll see if I can link it.
My heart just wouldn't be in it, you know? haven't got one.
I too hope India will succeed America. Its a fast developing country and military strength is also really good. It is training other countries soldiers in that case.
Military Strength has nothing to do with it.

Anyone can grab a gun and kill some one else. The fact that America prides it self on its Military Strength has always annoyed me.

"America You can't mine here anymore."
"Okay. Cool. We'll just leave."

Ten Bombs Later...

"Oh Hey! Remember us?"

It doesn't make any country an economic powerhouse. Or an allrounded superpower.
My heart just wouldn't be in it, you know? haven't got one.
yeah INDIA will succeed!
strongest air force
btw hi teknik
__________________________________________________
There you go again with the manpower crap.

Also hey.
My heart just wouldn't be in it, you know? haven't got one.
The us is 3 times as large and 6x as rich and decades ahead in military technology... we will not be succeeded for a long time
PigeonHive Flap Buzz