HTOTM: FUSION
How does celebrating Christmas make an atheist dishonest? Yes, it has its roots in religion, but an atheist could just as well celebrate it for the pleasure and joys of the activities involved. Being an atheist doesn't mean taking distance from everything related to religion, but simply one who believes that there is no deity. Regardless of whether they are posers or try to push their atheist beliefs, as long as they genuinely believe there is no deity, they are atheists as any other that matches the criterion.
I'm Atheist and I think Christmas, Easter and almost any mainstream holiday is or was Pagan until Christianity swept Norway and and other places off their feet. Christmas was orignally Pagan and there to celebrate the winter solstice feasting getting drunk of mead It was all there before christianity, then this Jew pops up and relinquishes Christmas of it's pagan spirit and turned it into the birth of christ or I mean some Pope. Again Easter is very Pagan down to the very core. I see the Seasons a time to party.

Also about god(s) How many do you think there are? Through out history people have been making these gods.
Last edited by T0ribush; Feb 18, 2010 at 05:59 PM.
Originally Posted by War_Hero View Post
I'm a pretty extreme atheist and I celebrate most mainstream holidays. Christmas, Easter, etc. Why? Because it's fun.

This is awesome.Good expression of individualism
I think this explain that if an atheist partecipe to other religious holiday,mean only that they have a personal reson for do it.It can be for give pleasure to others(for ex a reliious family),or it can be for personal reason(is fun,or in my case i love what we eat for christmas,reborn ecc.Epic sweet).SURE don't mean that in truth we/i'm not a "true atheist"(i need a certificate for be)

I have a friend that request from the Catholic Church(i live at 10 minuts from Vatican,so isnt so far)a certificate for erase his baptism.For me this is useless.I have a baptism and also the Eucharist and Confession(these are first 3,on 7 in total, Sacraments in Chatolic Curch),but then i grow up and understand was all a mass of bullshit(of course i can wrong,but sure no one will have the possibility to show me the proofs before i'll die,and then who will care?).Now for what reason i have to lose my time to request a certificate for erase them,or simply for demonstrate to others that i'm an atheist?Who care?Where is the point? And then,for you,partecipe to a "religious" holiday,is a way for demonstrate our bliefs(both for atheist and religious?

About the fact that some Atheist "attack" religious people..personally i think people belive in Gods only for have an expectation of a better life(and doing this in most of case,they have a bad life now,only considering the fact that they have to live in sins[without consider if then their life is good or not]).I simply belive in TRY to have a better life now,and then i will see.So i don't have nothing against them..only another way for see the life(is obviously that for me,mine is better,like for them,their is better).
But i hate everyone who contribute to keep Churchs in life.Church(above all catholic and muslim)contribute to ruin the world.That's cause is made by men that try to convince other men that they are "closer" with the God(every kind of god).But sadly they are only men,and like every man that have a sort of powers on other men,they abuse of their power.So i'm against the "important" men of churchs,and i think that "not important people" in church(starting from "low clere",arriving to everyone that really belive in what church say)have to be "shaken" for let them understand that church are a cancer.This can be misrepresented and let think someone that i feel myself "better",only 'cause i'm atheist,but isnt this the point.I only want that people start to think with their mind,and if then they'll still belive in gods...no problem!Almost they'll reach that idea from theirself,instead of for their education(and everyone have the tool,called brain,for go against imposed education)
Btw,with this definition of agnostic,i can be a kind of agnostic too.I neither care if there are a God or not,because if there are,is clear that we cant see,interact or have nothing to do with him.But for me a thing that exist,but is useless,it is as if don't exist(so without have a proof of his utility,for me god is useless)

*these are hard discussion in a language that i never sudied with effort,so if you don't understand some part,say where and i'll try to put with other words.If you don't understand nothing...btw isnt so important=P
Last edited by bRuCiA; Feb 18, 2010 at 06:10 PM.
Are you interested in my deactivated inventory?
Send a pm to Missuse for trade(NOT TO ME)
Religion are falling down! pll are getting cleverest, we could be created for a god couse the unvierse have no limits, so we dont know all about it, but there is no ONE FUCKING reason to beilive that. ppl who beilive in god is ppl who dont think by himself he just repeat what other guys says whit out think is if that rigth or not.
i give 50 years more until religion lose his powers.
50 years? No way, buddy. Religion is hardwired into any extremely curious person who ponders our existence... Humanity. No matter how far we get we're not going to get close enough to the answer if there even is an answer for that matter.

Though I think religion is taken too literal. Sure I can read the bible and disregard all the fairy tales, but the lessons. I'll be a good person, though I don't need the bible because I already am a good person. God is just a catch for what lessons there are to be taught. You don't want to be kind to your neighbor your whole life or even live in pride your whole life without something in return. So, that's where heaven steps in. An eternity of worshiping without violence and conflict. Hell is to make sure you don't disobey what you have been taught.
Originally Posted by Zorath View Post
Religion are falling down! pll are getting cleverest, we could be created for a god couse the unvierse have no limits, so we dont know all about it, but there is no ONE FUCKING reason to beilive that. ppl who beilive in god is ppl who dont think by himself he just repeat what other guys says whit out think is if that rigth or not.
i give 50 years more until religion lose his powers.

This is the classic position of an adolescent atheist(isnt an insult,almost if you have 30 year).You are confonding religion with churchs. Belive in something is part of human being,and religion is a try to give something in to belive
In the next 50 y both religion and church will be still here.What is sure,almost in occident,is that there will be less priests,thanks god!
Are you interested in my deactivated inventory?
Send a pm to Missuse for trade(NOT TO ME)
Religion is just a naive and primitive human's attempt to explain something they saw. They used things they had seen before, and cobbled together a horrid unpovable explanation.

Then along came science, and we dont just skip to the answers. Science doesnt know all the answers, and they admit that. But they are there to find an answer.
When I see you, my heart goes DOKI⑨DOKI
Fish: "Gorman has been chosen for admin. After a lengthy discussion we've all decided that Gorman is the best choice for the next admin."
Originally Posted by bRuCiA View Post
This is the classic position of an adolescent atheist(isnt an insult,almost if you have 30 year).You are confonding religion with churchs. Belive in something is part of human being,and religion is a try to give something in to belive
In the next 50 y both religion and church will be still here.What is sure,almost in occident,is that there will be less priests,thanks god!

Brucia trust me i tougth too many times about this and disscus with a lot of ppl ( maybe the wrong ppl ) but they never give a good argument in his beilives, they just said, the bible say, or read the bible ( wich i tougth is just a story with lesson ) there is ppl who really trust in adan y eva as bible say, they arent clever enougth to understand the real point of the story. they are blind belivers.
i know the world is suspiciously perfect, and its hard to figured out. but a god? that makes everything even more complicated.
oh and i dont say it will be no more church or religion i just said they'll lose his power, there will be more pll confused ( atheyst - agnostics- whatever ) btw my age is 23 i considere myself an adolecent yet
Originally Posted by Gorman View Post
Agnostics fall into a few basic categories

A) Posers; people who want to be different but even consider Atheism to be too mainstream

B) Slow people; they just haven't had the time to think about what they actually believe

C) People who don't understand; they think 'Agnostic' is neutral, but its just someone who is uncommited or an idiot

D) Scared people; they do not want to be wrong.

Being Agnostic gives you no moral high ground. Atheists consider religions, but they also reject them. By being an Agnostic you are basicly saying "I don't want to choose, its too hard!"

I once considered myself an Agnostic, but thankfully Odlov and Mister616 showed me the way. I believe Mister616 once said; "Agnostics are idiots"

Pretty sure you just totally missed the point of agosticism there. Since you wrote a rather aggressive definition of the belief and those who share it, it's obviously a touchy subject for you lol.
Agnostics are the sensible people who accept that the existence (or lack thereof) or the nature of any higher power cannot be proven one way or the other, and therefore, based on the evidence presented, choose to opt out of taking a stab in the dark with their beliefs based on insufficient evidence of a 'god' one way or the other. This mode of thought could be described as 'logical'. If you want, i'll post the reasoning behind why there is not enough evidence for or against a god, but it'll end up rather tl;dr.

There is no obligation to commit to the belief that there is a god, or his absence in any case anyway. Especially in the case that neither point of view is a proven fact.

Many philosophers have infact speculalted on the presence of a god, but not in the sense of any organized religion to my knowledge. (see Voltaire: "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.", for an example of this 'different' approach to god.)

Originally Posted by Zorath
Religion are falling down! pll are getting cleverest, we could be created for a god couse the unvierse have no limits, so we dont know all about it, but there is no ONE FUCKING reason to beilive that. ppl who beilive in god is ppl who dont think by himself he just repeat what other guys says whit out think is if that rigth or not.
i give 50 years more until religion lose his powers.

evidently you are not getting cleverest?
Originally Posted by War_Hero View Post
The term Agnostic is useless. Someone who is entirely neutral on the idea of a god is an Atheist.

I'm a pretty extreme atheist and I celebrate most mainstream holidays. Christmas, Easter, etc. Why? Because it's fun. Also, as a bonus it pisses people off.

Originally Posted by http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu
atheist (someone who denies the existence of god)

Originally Posted by http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu
agnostic, doubter (someone who is doubtful or noncommittal about something)
agnostic (a person who claims that they cannot have true knowledge about the existence of God (but does not deny that God might exist))

Yeah, if you ignore the dictionary. And connotations that people associate with the word.

Originally Posted by Gorman View Post
About Agnostics:

Agnostics fall into a few basic categories

A) Posers; people who want to be different but even consider Atheism to be too mainstream

B) Slow people; they just haven't had the time to think about what they actually believe

C) People who don't understand; they think 'Agnostic' is neutral, but its just someone who is uncommited or an idiot

D) Scared people; they do not want to be wrong.

Being Agnostic gives you no moral high ground. Atheists consider religions, but they also reject them. By being an Agnostic you are basicly saying "I don't want to choose, its too hard!"

I once considered myself an Agnostic, but thankfully Odlov and Mister616 showed me the way. I believe Mister616 once said; "Agnostics are idiots"

There is no way that an intelligent logical thinking person could come to the conclusion that they "have come to no conclusion". It is simply impossible.

This is flame-bait. Where, then, do I fall? I do not change my views for the benefits of others, so I am not A. I have had plenty of time to evaluate my position, so I am not B. As I lived most of my life as an atheist, I assure you that I am not D.

You have not qualified C at all. An agnostic is someone who is open to the idea of a creator. An agnostic is someone who looks at the totality of our knowledge and deems it insufficient to pass judgment on; much like a scientist with a limited set of data may refrain from making a firm conclusion. Given how much we don't know it seems presumptuous to call oneself an atheist.

Originally Posted by Isaac Asimov
I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time to say it. I've been an atheist for years and years, but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didn't have. Somehow it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic. I finally decided that I'm a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally I am an atheist. I don't have the evidence to prove that God doesn't exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn't that I don't want to waste my time.

I lived by this for a large period of my life, but I cannot ignore our theological and scientific gaps in knowledge any more.