Provide a scientific and logical background for that line of reasoning and I'll take it a little more seriously.

Heck, the entire source and its sources are incredibly dodgy. The link to the supposed study doesn't actually work and this is a blog with what, 10 readers?

If this was an actual issue or if there was any real correlation, mass media would be over it like dogs on a steak.

Suo: I dunno, seems like carbon would be even more at fault here. Those little assholes.

Edit: NoCheerios sets an incredibly illogical tone in his post the absolute moment he begins to claim that diet has a proven, significant impact on risk of cancer.
Your diet does influence your immune system (but by very small degrees, ESPECIALLY between vegans who know what they're doing and regular omnivores), and that alone is the only link between what you eat and whether a tumor pops up and says hi in your pancreas. Dietary supplements for cancer have for a long time now been recognized as a disgusting sham on the same level as resveratrol. Unless you're claiming radioactive foods come in little boxes labeled lunchables, in which case your claim doesn't even deserve a rebuttal.

Actually, NoCheerios has extrapolated an amazing number of fantastical claims from a faulty, obscure, unfindable, unscientific source. Thread should not remain open long.