Originally Posted by
hanz0
These small differences mean next to nothing when you remember that drugs don't have the exact same effect on every single person.
EDIT: Now that I think about it, I'm not even convinced that the "differences" are differences at all. You can't say that the kid's dad stopped because someone stopped him, all that's known is that someone tried to check on him, and then he proceeded to go outside and attack his own legs with an axe - you're trying to put rationale into the mind of someone on a serious hallucinogen, and that's just not going to work. I'm also not sure what you're saying as far as "nothing being eaten". In the Lurch case, he ate part of his roommate's lung. In this case, you yourself said that part of the face were consumed. Mind clarifying that one?
The biggest difference in all the cases is the extent to which they took it. The father ate one of the kid's eyes, and damaged the other. Lurch ate part of his roommates lung, and bit into her face a bit, only enough to leave bite marks(on the face, although he did do a number on her lung). He used a knife to access the lungs. A tool. A human tool. The irresponsible father tried to chop his leg off with an axe. A tool. A human tool.
This guy completely devoured this man's face, to the point where the man is unrecognizable in any way, shape, or form(so far, dna testing/fingerprints not included). With his bare hands. Animosity, rather then something that could have been possibly calculated with the limited rationale a person under the influence of PCP has. Precision is involved when you aim only at a child's eyes, or, chopping your leg off with an axe, or, attempting to devour someone's lungs. Neither of those cases had the sheer animosity aspect to it. I'd compare this more to a bear mauling, rather then an attempted homicide, based on what information we currently have. He also growled at the police officer. Even someone under such a hallucinogen is capable of respond in a more human way.
I do believe the man was on drugs, but not PCP. PCP doesn't take away someone's humanity, just obscures it.
That was the difference
Originally Posted by
KmMad
so your saying that the man who attacked his son was most likely not under the influance of PCP, but the man in miami was since he was sporting un-human characteristics? rather they were both were and took(probably) a diffrent dosege of PCP and had different reactions?
What...? Have you read anything I've said?
Originally Posted by
SirPimp
Wait,i heard that he wasn't actually eating his face,just bite it a bit.
Anyone has seen his face after the attack?
The police said the man was completely unrecognizable, and all human features of his face(eyes, nose, ears, everything).
E: Latest update: http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/29...ng-bath-salts/
Told you it wasn't PCP.
Last edited by Hyde; May 30, 2012 at 03:57 AM.