If what I understand from this is correct, then I don't think bullies need "to be brought back" for this reason. If a child is socially inept, or unaccustomed to the hard spots in life, I would think that'd be a problem with parenting more than anything. Your father and/or mother are there to help guide you through life, teach you stuff etc. I think it's more "how do we give children/teens the knowledge to deal with life." only in a perfect world though. Bullying is the wrong approach though.
Boy do I say life a lot.
Boy do I say life a lot.
I came here to laugh at you
Just to clear things up before I post. Do you want to lax regulations or to up and encourage antagonizing students?
<&Fish>: did you just infract the toribot?
<&Fish>: you're fired
<&Fish>: you're fired
<JSnuffMARS> sounds like a drug-addiction or mastu(I'll censor that word)
<bishopONE>: also yeah fisting
<mwah> Gynx is it true you got admin over hero because hes from pakistan
Originally Posted by sid
Just to clear things up before I post. Do you want to lax regulations or to up and encourage antagonizing students?
^ this. So do you basically suggest that kids should abuse and bully some kids at schools, because you think that it would make the bullied kids more of a "man"? Do you suggest schoolgirls shouls also get bullied?
OP made me laff today.
But anyway, I find that trying to regulate 'bullying' (I emphasize bullying since many schools are very obviously trying to stop more than just that) is more or less dealing with a double-edged blade.
In saying so, on one hand you have a portion of a generation of children growing up with depressing and troubled social childhoods, and on the other you have a generation of children growing up with less social preparation than Steve Urkel.
Usually I just interpret this as, "either way, some kids are going to be fucked up."
But anyway, I think that the latter consequence is only apparent because of the system's over-involvement in the situation.
If anything, the bullying of a student should be brought to the attention of a parent or teacher, and then dealt with accordingly. Nothing more, nothing less. Else we may as well end up back where we began.
But anyway, I find that trying to regulate 'bullying' (I emphasize bullying since many schools are very obviously trying to stop more than just that) is more or less dealing with a double-edged blade.
In saying so, on one hand you have a portion of a generation of children growing up with depressing and troubled social childhoods, and on the other you have a generation of children growing up with less social preparation than Steve Urkel.
Usually I just interpret this as, "either way, some kids are going to be fucked up."
But anyway, I think that the latter consequence is only apparent because of the system's over-involvement in the situation.
If anything, the bullying of a student should be brought to the attention of a parent or teacher, and then dealt with accordingly. Nothing more, nothing less. Else we may as well end up back where we began.
