Originally Posted by
GoodBox
Personally, I think to better answer this question one has to assign a "persona" to the objects in question.
Take Redundant's example for instance, and this time let's say that the human in question is named John.
Instead of asking if John is human, I think a better question would be: Is the end product of all those replacements still John?
Some would argue that the end product is still John, He remained John after the first step and thus must be so after every step.
Others however would claim that, since none of the original 'John' remains, the end product is merely a "collection of prostheses."
A third, more extreme, argument would be that even after the initial replacement, the end product is no longer John.
To clear this up a little more, watch the movie Robocop (2014 version - don't get me wrong the classic is great but the newer version makes the discussion easier to understand)
Robocop is about a police officer named Alex Murphy who gets critically injured by a car-bomb. He is selected for the 'Omnicorp program' and he undergoes a procedure where is he is 'enhanced' with a cybernetic body and software.
After the procedure, Alex is shown that only his heart, lungs, throat, head and right hand are left of his original body; the rest is robotic. His brain is now controllable by use of software (ie. his chemistry levels/emotions can be altered by computers).
Coming back to the question: "If a car gets all of its parts replaced, is it the same car?", it depends on the sentimental value of the thing/object you're talking about.
Knowing Alex Murphy before the incident, you have some sort of emotional attachment (can be a tiny amount, can be a large amount). Even after the incident, where you see him having only a time amount of him left, you still recognize him as the same person but with 'upgrades', regardless if he still IS actually Alex Murphy or just a machine, instead of a completely different person/thing because there is more robotic parts than human parts.
Another movie came to mind when reading this thread: Robots.
Basically, the bad robot takes over the good robot's company and discontinues the making of spare parts for robots, only making room for new parts/upgrades. He then pitches the slogan, "Why be you, when you can be new?"
I'm not 100% sure that this fits in with the current topic because it asks "why be you..", where that's about self-confidence and all that shenanigans blah blah blah, but then again, it also brings up the same question as the thread "is something still the same after it undergoes change/upgrade?" so yeah.
This article paints a good picture on the topic, I think:
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news...ou-can-be-new/
(Ignore that religious junk at the bottom of the article)