HTOTM: FUSION
If you remove greed, lust, ambition, negative emotion and fear from the equation, while giving society a set of guidelines, they wouldn't be failures since they would be obedient, tranquil, and intelligent. Some sort of industrialist socialist empire would form and proto-humanity would reach the stars.
-----
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
I don't see how socialism or communism are necessary.

Just an attitude shift is all that is needed.

An attitude shift towards what? Consumerism? Capitalism is built off the exploitation and corruption of the human condition, i.e a prison with invisible walls. There will never be a perfect world with the current system. I don't see how communism (see: world peace) would be "un-necessary" either.
Last edited by Zking; Oct 12, 2014 at 10:45 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Not to go too off-topic here but all these systems for Capitalism to Communism all work on paper as an idea but in the end humans are super fallible so getting rid of the things that make us human COULD work out great, but on the lesser end, leave us in a world without all its beauty like the world in 'The Giver'

You see feelings like pain and trauma etc are gateways to showing compassion and love etc leading us back to a sort of universal balance where good and evil balance out.

I'm also an advocate for Communism in some part (minus the mass murder associated with the idea) but really I can't see a world that is truly perfect, I don't know, it's hard to imagine after millennia of failure. Do you really think now can be the time? Based on whats going on around us, I think not. That doesn't rule out the future possibilities though.
Black Emporer MY TEXTURE SHOP: http://tiny.cc/IssaShop
Originally Posted by Zking View Post
If we found a way to alter human nature, there would be no abuse of the system due to lack of greed and ambition.

Yes, but the circle has to start somewhere. Once it's in place it's a different thing, but how do you put the system in place from the start?

You see feelings like pain and trauma etc are gateways to showing compassion and love etc leading us back to a sort of universal balance where good and evil balance out.

Yes, i don't think we should remove core emotions. The problem with humans are that they're not adapted to our modern society. That's why we have discrimination, prejudice and violence. Emotions is still essential to us for making art and being intelligent generally.
Last edited by Lazors; Oct 12, 2014 at 11:16 PM.
Brendan (he who passeth judgement on the frequent changing of signatures): I don't do hentai anymore
Originally Posted by Lazors View Post

Yes, i don't think we should remove core emotions. The problem with humans are that they're not adapted to our modern society. That's why we have discrimination, prejudice and violence. Emotions is still essential to us for making art and being intelligent generally.

Emulations of emotions and actually feelings emotions are different bro.

Art is a mere emulation of emotion (most of the time).
Originally Posted by king4life View Post
I'm also an advocate for Communism in some part (minus the mass murder associated with the idea)

Do you really think now can be the time?

The mass murder association stems from ignorance as there has never been a real world application of communism.

No, we're not ready at this point. With time and effort we will be.

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
Yes, but the circle has to start somewhere. Once it's in place it's a different thing, but how do you put the system in place from the start?

Non-corruptible individuals such as myself would have to set the course in motion and then watch the results, theoretically.

Originally Posted by Velair View Post
Emulations of emotions and actually feelings emotions are different bro.

Art is a mere emulation of emotion (most of the time).

^
Originally Posted by Zking View Post
If you remove greed, lust, ambition, negative emotion and fear from the equation, while giving society a set of guidelines, they wouldn't be failures since they would be obedient, tranquil, and intelligent. Some sort of industrialist socialist empire would form and proto-humanity would reach the stars.
-----


An attitude shift towards what? Consumerism? Capitalism is built off the exploitation and corruption of the human condition, i.e a prison with invisible walls. There will never be a perfect world with the current system. I don't see how communism (see: world peace) would be "un-necessary" either.

Assuming that emotions and motivations are as clear cut as you seem to imply they are (which we cannot prove as of now) and that it's even possible to cull specific emotions without influencing related emotions (lust and love are just varying degrees of attraction), the "remove emotions, insert obedience" reeks of authoritarianism.

I'm all for human augmentation, there's nothing wrong with prosthetics or externalization of human function, but augmentation is not the same as modification. It's one thing to make a better eye, or a better arm, or a faster brain, this is just enhancing that which is already present. But modification is a judgement call on what is superior and inferior, and with something as complicated as our mind, it is ludicrous to make assumptions on what is superior for the advancement of humanity.


And let's not get into theoretical, perfect world arguments if you're not going to apply the same scenario to the other side. In a perfect world, capitalism is the harnessing the resources of society to meet the greatest demands of society and delivering them efficiently to society at little cost because of competition. In practice, attempts at capitalism create a massive imbalance of power between haves and have-nots. In a perfect world, communism is the harnessing of the resources of the society to fulfill the needs of society. In practice, attempts at communism create the same imbalance of power that capitalism creates.
nyan :3
Youtube Channel i sometimes post videos of other games
We can augment the human body in impressive ways already, I'm sure this will only improve in the future.
But the brain is what makes you yourself, and the brain deteroriates with age, like any organ. We'll be probably able to replace everything in a human except the brain itself. You can talk about uploading personalities to some computer, but will that program really be you? Let's say you are on the far edge of mental deteroriation, so they make a copy of your personality and upload it to the cloud. There will be a time period when you exist on the cloud and in the real world. So question is, is the cloud version of you really you? I'd say no.
Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
Assuming that emotions and motivations are as clear cut as you seem to imply they are (which we cannot prove as of now) and that it's even possible to cull specific emotions without influencing related emotions (lust and love are just varying degrees of attraction), the "remove emotions, insert obedience" reeks of authoritarianism.

I'm all for human augmentation, there's nothing wrong with prosthetics or externalization of human function, but augmentation is not the same as modification. It's one thing to make a better eye, or a better arm, or a faster brain, this is just enhancing that which is already present. But modification is a judgement call on what is superior and inferior, and with something as complicated as our mind, it is ludicrous to make assumptions on what is superior for the advancement of humanity.


And let's not get into theoretical, perfect world arguments if you're not going to apply the same scenario to the other side. In a perfect world, capitalism is the harnessing the resources of society to meet the greatest demands of society and delivering them efficiently to society at little cost because of competition. In practice, attempts at capitalism create a massive imbalance of power between haves and have-nots. In a perfect world, communism is the harnessing of the resources of the society to fulfill the needs of society. In practice, attempts at communism create the same imbalance of power that capitalism creates.

Theoretical concepts are always based on what we know, human intelligence is limited to a fraction of the universal truth. But the point of this thread remains, from what we do know + hypothesizing we can at least get a sketch of what it would be like, augmentation or modification respectively.

And I think we are already living in a "perfect capitalist world".

Originally Posted by ynvaser View Post
You can talk about uploading personalities to some computer, but will that program really be you? Let's say you are on the far edge of mental deteroriation, so they make a copy of your personality and upload it to the cloud. There will be a time period when you exist on the cloud and in the real world. So question is, is the cloud version of you really you? I'd say no.

So basically the movie transcendence? Nothing necessarily to do with transhumanism but a very interesting concept none the less.
What you think doesn't make it true. There is no perfect world capitalist market, let alone a true capitalist market, in existence right now. There hasn't been even remotely near a true capitalist market since the 1800s in Europe.

And if the point of the thread is to just guess at what transhumanism would look like, this might as well be moved to offtopic or closed, because there's no real discussion to be made. The ethics of transhumanism is debatable; guessing what transhumanism would look like is more akin to a circlejerk "tell me ur opinion guise" type of thread.
nyan :3
Youtube Channel i sometimes post videos of other games
Originally Posted by Zking View Post
An attitude shift towards what? Consumerism? Capitalism is built off the exploitation and corruption of the human condition, i.e a prison with invisible walls. There will never be a perfect world with the current system. I don't see how communism (see: world peace) would be "un-necessary" either.

An attitude shift away from technophobia. That's all that is needed.

Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
But modification is a judgement call on what is superior and inferior, and with something as complicated as our mind, it is ludicrous to make assumptions on what is superior for the advancement of humanity.

Sure, people will have to make choices. But you could always augment without losing anything, for example adding a processor or memory without removing a part of your brain.

Originally Posted by Zking View Post
And I think we are already living in a "perfect capitalist world".

Pure capitalism does not exist in the world, not a single country is capitalist.
<Faint> the rules have been stated quite clearly 3 times now from high staff