Originally Posted by
FruitCandy
Meh. More like: Hey, this is my shop, and you can smoke over there >>>
Second, I meant for the title to be Self Moderated Threads.
Anyway, here's an example: Some kid asks a yes or no question, or asks something in general in maybe an Art thread or off-topic thread, and you give said person a "Yes" or "No" or maybe a "Sure, I can help you out. Skype me @ . . . "
These posts get deleted all of the time bruh ^
-----
Yes. I voted in my own poll. I'm pitiful ;-;
No, bad analogy. Smoking isnt outlawed everywhere else but your shop. But in the case of these forums useless posts are.
Ah yes I remember your example. Yes thats a shitty post and it had all the right to be deleted. If somebody asks for help you help them in that thread, not ask them to add you on skype. you are completely dodging the thread, and if that was your post you should have just sent a pm
Originally Posted by
ZENBOY123
I received an infraction for supporting a suggestion because my post didn't add to it enough. I guess thread makers could add to the OP "I will moderate this thread myself".
Yeah, saying "Supported" doesnt add anything. Literally if you would say "Ok, I read through this, and from what I see I believe this could be a good idea. maybe x could work too?" you wouldnt get infracted.
Originally Posted by
ZENBOY123
I feel like on many occasions inactivity in threads is due to people getting an infraction and being afraid to post there again. That suggestion I supported about betting I didn't post there again after receiving 2 infractions. I feel like especially in Suggestion, Off-Topic & Discussion it should be allowed for the maker of the thread to be as harsh or lenient as they want.
This is an almost baseless opinion, only based on your one anecdotal piece of evidence of YOU being dumb and getting 2 infactions and YOU not posting in the thread afterwards.
Originally Posted by
ZENBOY123
Grohenbird that can cause threads to die out though. The point of a thread is to talk to multiple people at once instead of just having a string of PMs with one guy. And I would say suggestions are just as much about seeing if the populous would like to see it implemented as it about adding to said suggestion.
See rules, of course they are very good. They keep the entire forums from turning into the Hall of Shame, but when over-enforced it can cause people to fear posting anything at all which obviously isn't the intention of the staff. The staff is doing the best they can and if they see us point out a better way I'm sure they'll gladly take it. I have a lot of infractions and a fair amount of them was because I didn't read the rules back then but for newbies I feel like they should get more warnings unless they go breaking rules non-stop with shitposts etc.
-snip-
If it is "just as about" why dont you add onto the suggestion.
there is no overenforcement. It is enforcement. If Grohen, or any other LMod was "overenforcing" rules then they would be told to stop, but I somehow doubt "overenforcing" rules is even a thing. Its just enforcing rules, but I guess some people are used to more lenient enforcement of said rules, so they cry "overenforcement"
tl;dr this is a bad suggestion and your arguments for it are bad
Last edited by duck; Aug 13, 2016 at 11:40 PM.