Originally Posted by fallu

A lot of countries have laws saying you need to be in education until a certain age. So you wouldnt be done with school quicker. The quality of teaching in homeschooling is often lower as well as the teacher often goes through a far less scrutinous job application process.

Also unless the child is doing extra curricular activities they will not be socialising with other children, andthey will inevitably be socialising less than an equivalent child at a public school, which can be unhealthy. The chance of a homeschooled child becoming anti social is higher than that of a public school child for this reason

Originally Posted by Smaiva

I would love to been schooled at home from my parents or a personal teacher.
But sadly this is only possible for richer families.
If you got enough money to buy a independent teacher for your kids you're the king.
Otherwise your kids mind is getting oppressed by the school and the teachers forced to do their brain wash shit.

Hard to believe ? Yeah maybe, but please don't send your kids to disney land as well please.
It is a definitve yes for home schooling, the parents should have control over all the stuff that their kids get pumped in to their brain by teachers/television/NWO.

Originally Posted by fallu

1) Do you not think that the stunting of social capabilities is a strong deterrent from homeschooling?
2) Can you explain the process by which a child's mind is being oppressed by a school.
3) What lies are schools systematically teaching all children (as is inferred by the term "brain washing")?

Originally Posted by Ele

I don't what an ISS is, but it seems to me like perhaps you had problems fitting in. I think you'd probably agree that it wouldn't be unfair to say that the reason for this might be related to your homeschooling.

Would you agree that you find it easier to get along with adults (or people that are more mature than you), rather than other kids your age?

Originally Posted by WeooWeoo

The only downside i have ever seen to homeschooling is how much one can become anti social. My little cousin is and has mainly been home schooled, in which his mom isnt even teaching him shit or getting him in some online plan.

Not everyone becomes anti social from this. But, from experiences of my cousin, and a good friend of mine both being home schooled. He never leaves the house or talks to people in person. He only talks to us online on PS4. Known him since middle school. It definitely has its cons. But for him, he's really smart, but has a really bad lookout on life.

Originally Posted by DruggedPanda

I would consider myself somewhat anti-social and I went to public school my entire life.
Honeslty it depends on the person. Being anti-social isn't always a bad thing either.

Anyways, I think being homeschooled has it's advantages. One of the biggest advantages is probably the fact that you can work on school work at your own pace. This is definitely an advantage if you like to push yourself to get things done, and you could be done with school a lot faster than if you had gone to public school.

Originally Posted by fallu

A lot of countries have laws saying you need to be in education until a certain age. So you wouldnt be done with school quicker. The quality of teaching in homeschooling is often lower as well as the teacher often goes through a far less scrutinous job application process.

Also unless the child is doing extra curricular activities they will not be socialising with other children, andthey will inevitably be socialising less than an equivalent child at a public school, which can be unhealthy. The chance of a homeschooled child becoming anti social is higher than that of a public school child for this reason

Originally Posted by kendrikLMR

I've found in my personal experience that homeschooled kids are most of the time socially stunted. They don't spend time with their friends from school so they meet them online - pushing them into communities like deviant art and anime subreddits (the social abilities of most these people are needless to mention(typical social outcasts)).

Originally Posted by Chara

I've been thinking about starting homeschool since I'm very anti-social and I'd like to be able to stay home to do my work and not have to go and be with people I dislike. It'd also be a better way for me to focus since I wouldn't have any friends to hang out with so it'd probably just be me listening to music and doing work all day. The main problem I see with people starting home school after they already did regular school is that they're not used to doing work at home so they tend to slack off and start failing all of their classes requiring them to go back to public school and being really far behind from slacking off.

Originally Posted by Smaiva

I would love to been schooled at home from my parents or a personal teacher.
But sadly this is only possible for richer families.
If you got enough money to buy a independent teacher for your kids you're the king.
Otherwise your kids mind is getting oppressed by the school and the teachers forced to do their brain wash shit.

Hard to believe ? Yeah maybe, but please don't send your kids to disney land as well please.
It is a definitve yes for home schooling, the parents should have control over all the stuff that their kids get pumped in to their brain by teachers/television/NWO.

Originally Posted by fallu

1) Do you not think that the stunting of social capabilities is a strong deterrent from homeschooling?
2) Can you explain the process by which a child's mind is being oppressed by a school.
3) What lies are schools systematically teaching all children (as is inferred by the term "brain washing")?

Originally Posted by Smaiva

1) Don't unterstand this one
2) motivated child with no limits and a real high horizont goes first time to school being really exited:
teachers telling you you can't do this and that, you cannot reach this without doing that. The teacher is doing his job staying realistic, which is demotivating and limiting the creativity of each individuals mind. This act is really dangerous to the infinite fantasy of a young child. The hierarchy shit limits the child possibilites first of all.(I am teacher, you are nothing)

3) Lets start with this truth: average schools are not educating individuals, there is always a role model. So you can guess they are programming humans into their ideology.

Originally Posted by Smaiva

1) Don't unterstand this one What I was saying here, is the lack of other children to socialize with means the child will not have as much experience interacting with other people, which will have a negative impact on social skills, this is important as social skills are useful in pretty much every part of life

2) motivated child with no limits and a real high horizont goes first time to school being really exited:
teachers telling you you can't do this and that, you cannot reach this without doing that. The teacher is doing his job staying realistic, which is demotivating and limiting the creativity of each individuals mind. This act is really dangerous to the infinite fantasy of a young child. The hierarchy shit limits the child possibilites first of all.(I am teacher, you are nothing)Oppression refers to unjust or cruel treatment, teaching a child the heights they can reach if they work hard (which is still high, even if it isnt possible for the child to be superman like they wanted to be) is not unjust or cruel, its a fact they need to know.

If a teacher referred to pupils as "nothing" that would be oppressive, but if they did they would be sanctioned, the children are "pupils" or "students" which is not synonymous with nothing.

3) Lets start with this truth: average schools are not educating individuals, there is always a role model. So you can guess they are programming humans into their ideology. [b]Average schools teach their pupils a syllabus, in the case of primary school, this generally includes vital mathematics and english skills that it is important for the children to know. They are educating individuals the same way, yes, but they are still educating individuals. I dont know as much about for other countries but in the UK in high schools, generally the pupils have options for what subjects they take, to the point where students only usually take 3 subjects in their final 2 years of school. It's hard to argue that all the students are being programmed the same way then since they almost all have a different education at the end of it.

Originally Posted by Hyzroden

I'm sorry if I come off as rude, but you're completely uneducated in this subject. Sorry to be blunt, but this is one of the worst arguments I've ever heard. Did you even look up dual enrollment? I will be getting my AA in Comp. Science at the same time I graduate high school. Here's a link if you want to be that way. and here's some more just in case you decide to take this shit out of context: 1 2 3

Well there's lots of different things you can do. There are many curriculums you can start out with, along with virtual school. I'd say go for it and try your best, because it's better trying and failing, than not trying and getting absolutely no result.

2) I have no fucking idea. Other than the occasional 'beaver boy' or 'four eyes' complement, and the weird teacher, public school was fine. It's just that I work much better in a closed environment and I can learn at my own pace. With the shit I just signed up for I'm going to be super busy for a while.