Well this was the reason for 256x256 and 512x512 bumpmaps not to be added iirc.
blarg
don't know who requested or had the thought to add 256x and 512x bumpmap textures but I don't see the use of those anyway.
seeing that there are A LOT of images uploaded everyday, I doubt that the people who upload 1024x grounds will overtake the people who upload on 512x textures etc.
so I don't think uploading 1024x photos will make a difference.
All images posted in threads aren't stored on the forums, only textures and attachments are. And once a texture-item is re-purposed, the old image is deleted. So really only when a new texture-item is bought directly from the shop, a new image is being uploaded. (As far as I know.)
Lack of space is probably the reason to such low resolution attachments. (Or it might just be a bad service.)
This is my take on the economics; All people who want a ground texture and can afford a 512x will buy that. But people who can afford a 1024x will most likely buy that instead. And people will upgrade to those as soon as they have lowered in value or when they simply have enough TC. So over time, the majority of ground texture-items in circulation will become 1024x.
I'm still negative towards this.
If you don't know what bumpmaps are then you obviously don't see the use of them.
1024x1024 is 4 times as much as 512x512
X= 512x512
XX
XX
That being said, I'm sure I'd buy it, since it is a huge upgrade to 512
and on a side note, i use bumpmaps and would like see 512x512 bumpmaps
I don't really see the reason to increase the resolution and not the size.
512x512 is good enough quality for the size that it is, no need to upgrade on its quality but not size.