"Vitamin:
I was basing the fact that most people are accepting off of places where people would be on the internet playing video games. "
I took your original post to mean the term as it would apply to the population as a whole. It would seem that this is a case in which we talked past each other.
"I guess I just misinterpreted the sheep part so I see what you mean.
And you’re right, my opinion likely won’t change because I’m the one who has to live with it, so why would I spend my life hating myself if I don’t have to. And the reason I just assume things is because I’ve had this argument with religious people sooo many times and it’s always exactly the same. I apologize if I assumed wrong and I’d be happy to discuss if you’re actually open to thoughts on the subject and I’d try to be as open as I can be to your opinions. I just usually find it to be pointless because your arguments would be based off of religious beliefs that I don’t believe in, so it generally goes nowhere."
Why would you hate yourself? God doesn't hate you for being gay. This is an argument I see a lot and it never made sense. Everybody lives in sin, in one way or another, because we as humans are fallible. The one thing that we have to do is be repentant for our sins.
Also on the point of hating yourself, if there is a legitimate reason to hate yourself, then that should be something that you change about yourself. Humans don't get to accept themselves for who they are, this New Age crap with loving yourself is ridiculous.we should always be pushing to better ourselves and find flaws with ourselves that we can fix.
When you assume you make an Ass out of U and Me.
I'm perfectly open to hearing differing opinions from my own, however I can offer no promises that you'll be able to change my mind on this issue. I believe I've discussed this with pouffy in depth before, and we've reached a rather respectable agree to disagree stance on the issue.
Not everything I use is going to be based on religious viewpoints, most of it is ingrained in biology. I think our biggest contention, if we were to pursue this argument, would be on the interpretation of the biological facts, which evidence we use, and what we view as more substantial and logical.
"Arguing over the word is honestly just semantics and depends how you interpret it, but the “phobia” part usually isn’t taken literally. Most definitions I hear is that it’s a prejudice against homosexuality."
The intention of that segment in the original response was merely to poke fun at something I find ridiculous. Specifically I find ridiculous the fact that we started labeling this homophobia when it is not in fact a fear of gay people, but rather a rejection of their sexuality.
"And I’m not sure what you’re trying to say with your last part. You’re implying that happiness in this situation and being a good person can’t go together? Why would I not want happiness, and how would people converting from gay to straight somehow them a better person. I never said happiness is the overall goal of life, and I would agree that being a good person is more important, I just don’t see how being straight in any way changes that."
Happiness and being a good person usually does go together, however the intention should be to first be a good person, and happiness should be a result of that, rather than a goal in and of itself.
To follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Lord and savior, is to attempt to be a good man. When we stray from those teachings we are considered to be living in sin. This wasn't specifically an attack against homosexuality, rather I was trying to point out that sacrificing happiness sometimes becomes a necessity regardless of whether you are good or bad, living in sin or living outside of sin, whether you do the right things or not, you're never going to be able to achieve lasting happiness. It's just not how the human psyche works. I'd say that being straight has very little to do with being good, but rather that its opposite has a lot to do with being a sinful person.