Originally Posted by
NutHug
My autosave has only 20 replays of you so what I say now might be completely wrong. But according to most of those 20 replays your "style" would be to not play aggressive and strike (if at all) after the enemy has done his move if you fail to do so you do just look like a beginner.
So the only way to determine 'your style' is if you are successful. If you are successful you are improvising accordingly to your opponents move.
You could argue now that improvising and moving according to your opponent is your style but that would be among the lines of 'my style is having no style' and 'being unpredictable' stuff and at least I don't see having no style as a style. Your movements are too different to determine any kind of style.
To sum it up: your moves don't have much in common so I wouldn't consider you having a specific style. More like a skilled improvising.
Ah, so he's on to me...
Yes, my style is infact a random mish mash of mostly improv, some nooby moves and a dash of failure. However, when I do win, Its typically in spectacular fashion. However, my losesses are just as amazing, and far more frequent. I'd argue that this is indeed a playstyle, although you may disagree.
The ability to improvise and not use strict "saved moves" (ie: not being a toriscript like so many other players are) make me feel as though I have the best and purest style of all. I could learn how to "pwn all", but frankly its uninteresting to me. I'll keep plugging along as the improv guy, and you can handle the epic pwnage. Seems OK to me.
And vastly different in playstyles.