Secret Santa 2024
Originally Posted by deprav View Post
Just like african-american slaves, they were doing perfectly fine before the yankees gave them some ideas of emancipation & freedom. Or Tibetans, they were doing perfectly fine with the chinese government before western values messed up with their minds. Or women being excised in some poor african countries, they were doing perfectly fine before they started hearing about western values.
Ahhhh those western values... xD

Lol your examples are of problems from one culture forcing itself on another........................................... ....

Irony!
<Faint> the rules have been stated quite clearly 3 times now from high staff
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
Lol your examples are of problems from one culture forcing itself on another........................................... ....

Irony!

So western culture involved everyone being a slave? I am pretty sure inslaving another country's citizens is not a cultural invasion, it is oppression. I just felt I should point that out. I am not saying that your original point about Western culture was incorrect (or correct), just that Your counter of Deprav's point seems a little weak. It is thus not really so ironic and even if it was it didn't deserve an exclamation mark.
Good morning sweet princess
Slavery isn't a culture forcing itself on another, it's human traffic & exploitation mixed with racism.
The "excision exemple" is intra-cultural, and I'm pretty sure it's religious.
Only the tibetan issue is about the chinese culture & politic forcing itself upon them.

Even tho, the point about women being oppressed in certain islamic countries having nothing to do with "western values" would still stand.
Last edited by deprav; Jan 16, 2015 at 09:54 PM.
Originally Posted by protonitron View Post
So western culture involved everyone being a slave? I am pretty sure inslaving another country's citizens is not a cultural invasion, it is oppression. I just felt I should point that out. I am not saying that your original point about Western culture was incorrect (or correct), just that Your counter of Deprav's point seems a little weak. It is thus not really so ironic and even if it was it didn't deserve an exclamation mark.

No, it doesn't. But for slavery to exist at least some people have to be slaves, right? White slaves were used, then blacks were added to the mix when the African slave trade kicked off.

African-american slavery is definitely a product of colonialism. You can't seriously think that pre-colonial slave trade was just as excessive, right?

Originally Posted by deprav View Post
Slavery isn't a culture forcing itself on another, it's human traffic & exploitation mixed with racism.
The "excision exemple" is intra-cultural, and I'm pretty sure it's religious.
Only the tibetan issue is about the chinese culture & politic forcing itself upon them.

Even tho, the point about women being oppressed in certain islamic countries having nothing to do with "western values" would still stand.

The concept of slave trading just happened to coincide with colonisation huh? Well ignoring that trade customs and rights are an essential part of a culture, I guess you could argue that it's "just enslaving people and forcing them into another culture". By the way, it has nothing to do with racism - any source of slaves was used, it was just convenience.

Religion is a part of culture - quite a big part at that! Not sure why anyone would bother to argue otherwise...

And yes, China forcing their culture onto Tibet certainly is a problem.

Judging Islam by western values (especially modern values) is most certainly forcing western ideals onto another culture. Every culture has their own sense of right and wrong you know?
<Faint> the rules have been stated quite clearly 3 times now from high staff
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
No, it doesn't. But for slavery to exist at least some people have to be slaves, right? White slaves were used, then blacks were added to the mix when the African slave trade kicked off.

African-american slavery is definitely a product of colonialism. You can't seriously think that pre-colonial slave trade was just as excessive, right?


The concept of slave trading just happened to coincide with colonisation huh? Well ignoring that trade customs and rights are an essential part of a culture, I guess you could argue that it's "just enslaving people and forcing them into another culture". By the way, it has nothing to do with racism - any source of slaves was used, it was just convenience.

Religion is a part of culture - quite a big part at that! Not sure why anyone would bother to argue otherwise...

And yes, China forcing their culture onto Tibet certainly is a problem.

Judging Islam by western values (especially modern values) is most certainly forcing western ideals onto another culture. Every culture has their own sense of right and wrong you know?

So you honestly believe that as long as something is part of someone's culture then it is fine? This seems a little hard to understand for me. Although I don't want to get sidetracked I would appreciate an explanation of this view, since you have mentioned it several times without much justification.

I try to stay impartial until I can fully understand things but I can't help but be doubtful of the logic behind your culturally based moral compass, even if some aspects of it are similar to my own thoughts on the subject of morality in some ways.
-----
Or are you a Nihilist who believes morals are a social construct? Because that would rather complicate matters.
Last edited by Zelda; Jan 16, 2015 at 10:55 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Good morning sweet princess
Originally Posted by protonitron View Post
So you honestly believe that as long as something is part of someone's culture then it is fine? This seems a little hard to understand for me. Although I don't want to get sidetracked I would appreciate an explanation of this view, since you have mentioned it several times without much justification.

I try to stay impartial until I can fully understand things but I can't help but be doubtful of the logic behind your culturally based moral compass, even if some aspects of it are similar to my own thoughts on the subject of morality in some ways.
-----
Or are you a Nihilist who believes morals are a social construct? Because that would rather complicate matters.

Whether or not morals are a social construct aside, I think we can all agree that morals are dictated by your culture. Muslims living under Sharia law haven't all been walking around thinking "Sharia law is bad and oppressive but I'm going to stick with it anyway". The fact that morals change with the times should make it obvious that there's no such thing as universal morals.

Since morality is subjective, how can we judge someone else's culture? Naturally we can judge it by our standards, which boils down to "if it's different it's wrong". It is fairly obvious in this thread that this is what is happening. Some people are literally calling Islam barbaric or out-dated. Judging traditional values by modern values is an imposition, and it acknowledges that morals can change.

I don't believe one culture is more correct than another. Just because the west is the most prolific culture, does that mean we should westernize all countries? Just because right now we are pro-everything does that mean everyone else should be? In the past we changed our mind, in the future we might again.
<Faint> the rules have been stated quite clearly 3 times now from high staff
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
White slaves were used, then blacks were added to the mix when the African slave trade kicked off.

That makes it sound like it happened at the same time. By the time they used black slaves, whites enslaving each other went out of fashion at least a thousand years ago. I'd like to read your source if whites were indeed used as slaves when blacks were.
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
Whether or not morals are a social construct aside, I think we can all agree that morals are dictated by your culture. Muslims living under Sharia law haven't all been walking around thinking "Sharia law is bad and oppressive but I'm going to stick with it anyway". The fact that morals change with the times should make it obvious that there's no such thing as universal morals.

Since morality is subjective, how can we judge someone else's culture? Naturally we can judge it by our standards, which boils down to "if it's different it's wrong". It is fairly obvious in this thread that this is what is happening. Some people are literally calling Islam barbaric or out-dated. Judging traditional values by modern values is an imposition, and it acknowledges that morals can change.

I don't believe one culture is more correct than another. Just because the west is the most prolific culture, does that mean we should westernize all countries? Just because right now we are pro-everything does that mean everyone else should be? In the past we changed our mind, in the future we might again.

I agree with most of this, but projecting a moral system onto another culture to judge it is not enforcing Western values on a country, it is just judging it with them. And since Western values are the moral systems the people in this discussion are likely to follow it makes sense that this is how we evaluate the topic of this debate. The problem it that your arguments are from a different moral perspective to almost everyone else here, so we either have to argue the morality of Islam from both perspectives separately or choose one perspective to all keep to.

Sorry for the careless manner with which this post is written, I am short of time.
-----
We should not resort to arguing which moral system is best, because that is pointless and off topic.
Last edited by Zelda; Jan 17, 2015 at 02:38 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Good morning sweet princess
If you want to discuss moral relativism and the question if there are objective standards by which a culture can be judged, make a new thread.
This thread is about Islam's morality, so stay with that.
Muslims are just normal people they just have rules differently with others. And no when a muslims kills another religion or a same religion is a sin