I have here my own classification system for identity, meaning that it is not backed by evidence and is very likely to be flawed. Posting it here, so that you can look at and possibly correct it, as I will want to be able to express these ideas properly. As for personal identity, I am obviously unqualified to be making any sort of assumptions.
The primary identity is defined by the physical and verbal traits (or in the case of an internet forum, the username, avatar, signature, etc.) which are made apparent upon encountering, and interacting with the individual. All of the surface traits which the individual displays, especially unconscious displays such as word choice and gesturing in conversation (or the online equivalent, use of emoticons), form the fundamental identity. When one thinks of this person, these surface traits are the ones which immediately come to mind.
The secondary identity, is the one which the individual displays consciously. This would include behavioural traits, choice of clothing (or in Toribash, choice of item colours and textures), likes and dislikes, etc. This is the conventional identity, and it is the one most relevant to people that frequently interact with the individual, and the individual themselves.
The tertiary identity is the one which I define to be the persistent identity. This includes all the traits which aren't defined by the first two categories, which do not change easily over time, even as their primary and secondary identities change, such as the individual's beliefs, values, mental capability, etc.
Last edited by Wight; May 25, 2013 at 01:30 PM.