Christmas Lottery
Nope, I am correct.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot
"Although they are at temperatures of roughly 3,000–4,500 K, the contrast with the surrounding material at about 5,780 K leaves them clearly visible as dark spots[...]"

Motherfucker.
i have a totally post modern tattoo of a scalene triangle.
<DeadorK> fair maiden
<DeadorK> if the cum is going to be in your mouth
<DeadorK> it shall be in mine as well
[duplicated post, sorry]
Last edited by GenkiSudo; Jan 21, 2010 at 12:45 AM.
"There is enough on earth for everybody's need, but not for everyone's greed." - Mohandas Gandhi
Originally Posted by War_Hero View Post
Nope, I am correct.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot
"Although they are at temperatures of roughly 3,000–4,500 K, the contrast with the surrounding material at about 5,780 K leaves them clearly visible as dark spots[...]"

Motherfucker.

Hey Ignorant. They're cooler because they're escaping from the sun's core, coming out (farther from the incredibly hot, central core, therefore not as hot as the sun's surface)
They result of higher sun activity, not lesser. I'll make an analogy: They're like bubbles coming out of boiling water on a pot. The hotter the water, the more bubbles will appear. Get it now?

So no:
Less spots = less sun activity = less heat coming from the sun towards the rest of the solar system.
More spots = more sun activity = more heat coming from the sun towards the rest of the solar system.

Its the opposite of what you said here:
Originally Posted by War_Hero View Post
I'm pretty sure that sunspots are colder than the rest of the sun, so a calm sun is a hotter sun.

A calm sun is a sun with no spots (explosions). Its a colder sun.
"There is enough on earth for everybody's need, but not for everyone's greed." - Mohandas Gandhi
That analogy is not at all correct. Sunspots are created from disturbances(magnetic, I believe) in the outer layers of the sun. These disturbances make fusion less likely and have a small cooling effect. Also, the entire sun is a plasma, so bubbles are not necessarily hotter or colder. In boiling water, the bubbles have state changed.

Since solar flares are at a different temperature, they tend to release radiation at a different frequency than the rest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#...neous_emission
The energy is lower, so different wavelengths of light are released. This is where the misconception of solar flares releasing more energy comes from. It just releases different energy that can screw with us(from the electromagnetic crap that created the flare in the first place), but not raise the temperature.
i have a totally post modern tattoo of a scalene triangle.
<DeadorK> fair maiden
<DeadorK> if the cum is going to be in your mouth
<DeadorK> it shall be in mine as well
Quoted from War_Hero's articles, 'They are caused by intense magnetic activity'. So apparently War_Hero is indeed correct.
VERY IMPORTANT: THIS ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER IN USE. IF YOU WANT TO CONTACT ME THEN PM ONAMIST.
Originally Posted by SLAPPED View Post
Quoted from War_Hero's articles, 'They are caused by intense magnetic activity'. So apparently War_Hero is indeed correct.

So basically the national geographic and may other sources are dumbasses who don't know shit about when they wrote that shit. is that what you're trying to say?

They all say that the lack of sunspots leads to a cooler earth, while the profusion of sunspots leads to a warmer earth...

So who's War_Hero? Some sort of a revolutionary genius who understands more about the sun than all of these people who are studying the influence of sunspots on earth? From Galileu Galileu, Rudolf Wolf, Edward Walter Maunder to Heinrich Schwabe?

They all reached the conclusion that profusion of sunpots mean higher intensity and activity on the sun's surface (not to mention the coronal mass ejections that result from it) resulting in a warmer earth which is the opposite of War_Hero's theory of that leading to a calmer sun.

Let me quote War_Hero again so you see that he was implying that less sunspots = more powerful sun while more sunspots = colder sun.
Originally Posted by War_Hero View Post
I'm pretty sure that sunspots are colder than the rest of the sun, so a calm sun is a hotter sun.


btw here's some quotes from this site: http://www.crh.noaa.gov/fsd/astro/sunspots.php

Ultraviolet radiation increases dramatically during high sunspot activity, which can have a large effect on the Earth's atmosphere.

From the mid 1600s to early 1700s, a period of very low sunspot activity (known as the Maunder Minimum) coincided with a number of long winters and severe cold temperatures in Western Europe, called the Little Ice Age.


About the Maunder Minimum:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum

Little Ice Age

The Maunder Minimum coincided with the middle — and coldest part — of the Little Ice Age, during which Europe and North America, and perhaps much of the rest of the world, were subjected to bitterly cold winters. Whether there is a causal connection between low sunspot activity and cold winters is the subject of ongoing debate (e.g., see Global Warming). In 1709, the Rhine remained frozen until the summer. This contributed to widespread starvation and the lengthy emigration of Germans from the Palatine. These people are referred to as the Poor Palatines.

Last edited by GenkiSudo; Jan 22, 2010 at 02:32 PM.
"There is enough on earth for everybody's need, but not for everyone's greed." - Mohandas Gandhi
No I said that the article apparently supported War's argument. I did not say anything at all about National Geographic or about other sources, and I definitely never said that War is a revolutionary genius.
VERY IMPORTANT: THIS ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER IN USE. IF YOU WANT TO CONTACT ME THEN PM ONAMIST.
Alright, I did some side research. We were both right and wrong. Sunspots are cold and don't contribute at all to the heading of the earth. But they happen at the same time as other stuff that does increase our temperature.
i have a totally post modern tattoo of a scalene triangle.
<DeadorK> fair maiden
<DeadorK> if the cum is going to be in your mouth
<DeadorK> it shall be in mine as well
Originally Posted by War_Hero View Post
Alright, I did some side research. We were both right and wrong. Sunspots are cold and don't contribute at all to the heading of the earth. But they happen at the same time as other stuff that does increase our temperature.

Sunspots are colder compared to the rest of the sun's surface but that doesn't mean the sun will get colder and less active when they start to appear. Its the opposite..
Sunspots are a byproduct of a sun's frenzy period. Sunspots are signs of increased turbulence, pretty much like bubbles are the sign of water reaching its boiling point.
Last edited by GenkiSudo; Jan 22, 2010 at 11:16 PM.
"There is enough on earth for everybody's need, but not for everyone's greed." - Mohandas Gandhi
Solar activity(fusion) and magnetic activity are not the same thing.
i have a totally post modern tattoo of a scalene triangle.
<DeadorK> fair maiden
<DeadorK> if the cum is going to be in your mouth
<DeadorK> it shall be in mine as well