Originally Posted by m0o
CHINA BECAUSE THEY DRIVE THE LARGEST PORTION OF THE WORLDS ECONOMY
NUCLEAR WARHEADS CAN WIPE US ALL OUT BECAUSE NUCLEAR WINTER WILL WIPE OUT ALL FOOD SUPPLIES. WE HAVE MANY MANY MANY MANY MANY MORE NUKES THAN WE NEED TO ACHIEVE GLOBAL WINTER. FOOD DIES = YOU DIE.
FAGGOTS
You can grow food inside, sup.
<Tapion> Salmon is nice fish
Originally Posted by TIcux
Also, originally, the Tsar Bomba was supposed to be 100 Megatons but they reduced it to 50 because they were afraid of what might happen.
T0ribush: I could not get into two worlds even if my life depended on it.
ಠ_ಠ ಥ_ಥ
ಠ_ಠ ಥ_ಥ
Originally Posted by War_Hero
This whole nuke the world 10 times over stuff is absolute bullshit.
Even with all the nuke we have, we are nowhere close. We could wipe out a lot of population centers, but the direct explosions wouldn't even kill all of the people, much less put dent in the planet.
But the nuclear fallout would kill a shit load of people and cause a minor nuclear winter. The US posses around 5,113 nuclear warheads as of 2009 and that could cover the whole of Europe and more.
Originally Posted by sprooj
You can grow food inside, sup.
Not without sunlight and clean air.
Nuclear winter = no sunlight, below freezing temperatures and massive amounts of radiation.
Last edited by athrax; Jul 24, 2010 at 04:21 AM.
Originally Posted by athrax
But the nuclear fallout would kill a shit load of people and cause a minor nuclear winter. The US posses around 5,113 nuclear warheads as of 2009 and that could cover the whole of Europe and more.
Originally Posted by War_Hero
direct explosions
Also, I was refuting the blow up the world shit. Ofc it would ruin the entire ecosystem.
i have a totally post modern tattoo of a scalene triangle.
<DeadorK> fair maiden<DeadorK> if the cum is going to be in your mouth
<DeadorK> it shall be in mine as well
