Originally Posted by
Gorman
> Act pretentious
By saying what the law is?
Originally Posted by
Gorman
> Ignore counter arguments
What counter argument? I responded to his. The thing you offered wasn't an argument. It was your delusion on what the law should be. Not what it is. If you want me to respond to an argument, then make an argument. Not bullshit.
Originally Posted by
Gorman
> Ad hominem
What, calling him out on being a tosser at the end? I do so because of his condescending way of talking to me. You think that excuses the rest of my argument from validity?
Originally Posted by
Gorman
> Thinks reading 50 pages of legal documents on a tiny iPhone screen is 'reasonable'
It's not outrageous. It is legally binding. Deal the fuck with it.
Originally Posted by
Gorman
Your law school sure is shaping up to be a wise investment there bro.
Never said I ever went to law school, I've just done a TAFE course that has tort law as a fair few of the units. Regardless of my qualifications, I've demonstrated that I obviously know a lot more about this topic than you or the greentext guy. So I wouldn't be insulting my supposed 'lack of knowledge' if I were you.
What you've done here is just attacked me, and contributed
nothing at all to the argument.
Rather than 'sticking up' for the other guy, why don't you spend some time researching, so you, yourself, might actually come up with a decent argument.