Bro, your sig speaks for AMD's quality.
I had an intel dual core with less cpu than my current amd dual core, and the intel one behaved better ^^
uhh, how can a cpu be less of a cpu than another one
oh and I'm not your bro, and if my signature speaks for amd's quality, then amd rocks.
oh alright you say something is better "just because it is", nice justification of your own affirmations.
It's a simple justification over a statement repeated by multiple users across this thread, and if you ask any experienced computer specialist he would probably give the same answer. If you need further explanations/proof then use google, ask your local specialist, find somebody here who is willing to go through every technical detail concerning this comparison or better yet, use two processor with a similar cpu range, one from Intel and one from AMD, and compare them first handed over an extended period of time.
Well, it's obvious that they'll say intel is better, basically because their top notch i7's are fucking awesome and have the best technology out there. However, compare the i7 980x extreme's price to the AMD's Phenom II X6 1090T, and you'll see that the i7 is something like three times the price of the AMD, yet, the performance increase isn't three times better.
My rig has a stock 1055T and it runs fucking fine with BFBC2 maxed out(and yes BFBC2 does really need a good cpu to run fine), if I got an expensive as shit intel, what would I get more? A ~5 fps increase? Wow, that really justifies the price.