Ok well now I Have A Report For School 
ty guys..However the results of War Is All Most People Care About and not the people who Die in it.To all of you who posted here,i have to say that i wish i could bring all of you and put you guys on national TV so we Can tell these statements to The Blind.Again,ty guys.If you guys wish to discuss more about war,feel free.If not,than ill close the thread.
ty guys..However the results of War Is All Most People Care About and not the people who Die in it.To all of you who posted here,i have to say that i wish i could bring all of you and put you guys on national TV so we Can tell these statements to The Blind.Again,ty guys.If you guys wish to discuss more about war,feel free.If not,than ill close the thread.
Last edited by Eclave; Apr 17, 2011 at 05:43 PM.
Originally Posted by Mookiefish
I respect your opinion about this subject, but I'm still pressed toward cramming my views down your throat. Anyway, war has a purpose whether you like it or not. It will always exist, and it will always be a part of life. You don't like war? Fine, let's just leave Egypt and let Gadhafi keep bombing his own people. War has to exist in the long run. Humans are incapable of ever developing a permanent and peaceful resolve. I doubt you could live a conflict free life.
It is all a matter of power.
There exist too many powers to live peacefully. Uniting those powers would solve many problems.
I am quite certain that there will be a world government sooner or later.
Saying that war is a good and needed thing because of one guy being the evil one is rather silly. War itself brought most of the pain people experience all over the world.
Also: Before judging what Gadafi does you should ask yourself what the ones who try to stop them did in the past. Or tried ..
Their tries have not been very successfully, have they?
Gadafi is also not the super monster the media call him.
He helped Lybia by a great deal. He managed to free the country from debts, started many projects that improved the people's life, brought the industry up etc. Lybia has a better social system than most coutries.
Lybia has the highest average income in Africa, health care is for free, he built several universities and introduced school atttendance.
It is true that he used military force to stop people from trying to remove him. But that does not justify attacking a country.
Most people in Lybia infact like Gadafi because he helped the country develop so drastically.
Last edited by Redundant; Apr 17, 2011 at 06:25 PM.
How are you?
War is is the answer, to a certain point..but killing millions for oil because America is greedy isn't the answer..instead of sending out soldiers and money for ammo and equipment why not take all that effort and put it towards a long term solution, like electronic cars. We go kill millions then take their oil, then that oil runs out, and what're we going to do then? go kill more people for more oil?
The demon inside me exhales a breath of smoke, when i feel the beat in my chest like a stethoscope, check my pulse
Originally Posted by DeathDeeler
War is is the answer, to a certain point..but killing millions for oil because America is greedy isn't the answer..instead of sending out soldiers and money for ammo and equipment why not take all that effort and put it towards a long term solution, like electronic cars. We go kill millions then take their oil, then that oil runs out, and what're we going to do then? go kill more people for more oil?
Not trying to be rude, but this is a prime example of someone who doesn't know what the "War on Terror" is about. If we wanted their oil bad enough, we'd have taken it all by now. (I'll assume you're hinting towards America being in the Middle East).
Not giving a fuck about hurricanes is pretty badass - Fee
#ItemRights!
Originally Posted by Mookiefish
Not trying to be rude, but this is a prime example of someone who doesn't know what the "War on Terror" is about. If we wanted their oil bad enough, we'd have taken it all by now. (I'll assume you're hinting towards America being in the Middle East).
The war on terror is a laughable concept.
1. Terrorists are groups of people, attacking countries is not going to solve the terror problem in any way.
2. War encourages terror attacks. Imagine your country being attacked. I imagine you would be quite upset.
3. Al-Qaeda got their weapons from the U.S government back in 1980. They were used agains the Soviet Union.
It is well known that the Mujahadeen terrorists of
Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A.
Therefore Afghanistan was getting attacked because of US interests. The people there are not to blame.
War is a business that only a few can profit from. The US citizen are certainly not the ones who win anything from that situation. Nor are the people in the countries being attacked.
Vengeance is a pretty poor excuse .
Oh, and what a coincidence, Saddam got his power through the CIA as well.
Originally Posted by Saddam's parallel universe, BBC NEWS, Sunday, 26 January, 2003, 06:33 GMT
The coup that brought the Ba'ath Party to power in 1963 was celebrated by the United States.
The CIA had a hand in it. They had funded the Ba'ath Party - of which Saddam Hussein was a young member - when it was in opposition.
US diplomat James Akins served in the Baghdad Embassy at the time.
"I knew all the Ba'ath Party leaders and I liked them," he told me.
"The CIA were definitely involved in that coup. We saw the rise of the Ba'athists as a way of replacing a pro-Soviet government with a pro-American one and you don't get that chance very often. '
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programme...nt/2694885.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1670089.stm
How are you?
?
