Originally Posted by
FNugget
Oh, we killed women and children in Pakistan in that raid?
You sure as hell did in Iraq. Do you just 'not count' that?
Havn't you been hunting him for 10 years or so?
At the last estimate the US killed more than 100 times more civilians in Iraq than every terror organisation put together killed people. At the least, definitely more than Osama allegedly did in 911.
But I am sure you can just call that 'even', right? I am sure this proves you to be less barbaric than Bin Laden, right?
US so childish, when will they grow up.
Originally Posted by
Boredpayne
Yeah, I think he attacked a bit more than the soil. He also wasn't an allied nation, and he wasn't attacking an enemy of the U.S.
That doesn't even make sense.
You are saying it is only OK to slaughter 'enemies' of the US? Now THAT really is twisted!
Originally Posted by
Boredpayne
Attacked Pakistan? You really believe that it could be construed as an attack on Pakistan? Just because we killed a mutual enemy on their soil?
It certainly can be. US made illegal hostile military actions within Pakistan. I don't think "It was for
our your own good" can be expected to wipe this away. Weren't you alleging that Pakistan was hiding Bin Laden in a previous thread? If Pakistan and the US both agree that Bin Laden is mutual then why didn't the US just ask permission? It wouldn't be unheard of for a country to follow international law.
Originally Posted by
Boredpayne
Remind me how killing a murderer and enemy combatant is "twisted."
Remind me how assassinating a man is considered "justice".
You seem very confused.
If you are trolling; 5/10 obvious but it got me to bite.