colors depends on subjective perception. and it ranges between people.
and also everything we see, hear, feel or touch may be different from how it is. eye (not only human) can reconize limited number of colors, ear can hear sounds in limited range, and so on.. so we cant tell like something is verity. I hope u got what i mean.


i don't think we are able to answer this question. thats like if microbes will think about how puddle works/was created.. so this is pointless imo...


acting like that never prove anything except that you have nothing to say.
2 bad that arguing/discussing things on internet allways end up like flaming...
if you want some1 take ur words more or less seious try to provide counter facts/statements and actually talk to opponent, not like throw shit in him when he told something u didnt like to hear. if you can not then dont bother yourself to post. what the matter of opinion if it's not supported by facts/statements that u can rely on.


human are animals... we have lots in common in anatomy and psychology..
so no need to think like we are something different.. so there is nothing wrong if we choose more siutable partners for ourselves who have similar genetic code and /or good physical state. and thats why we find one woman more attractive then another, all of that are instincts. animal instincts.

and i still cant get the topic.. are we talking about possibility of afterlife, religion, or world creation/existance or life creation/existance? because all of this is different

i like to discuss these kind of stuff and read/share opinions but lets pick a topic more accurate.. Topic as it is no is too vague..
if we look on that religion and human beliefs i can say one thing, if we talk about world creation i say another thing, if we talk about creation of life i will say another thing... i don't want to make a huge posts since i'm not the one who suggested a topic...

Your mom told you that your great grandmother or whatever talked to her through seance(spellcheck). And you believed her. Riiiiiiight. You must be a genius. Guess what, dead people can't talk. Since we are on the subject, Santa isn't real, Ronald Reagan was NOT the devil, and many catholic priests molest kids.

If you ever read the bible, angels never had wings, nor were any of them black, so if Man thought up that couldnt he think up the whole idea in itself? I do believe the earth evolved from something somple to complex, but i also i think He helped do it. I really dunno on this one

so uh, wouldn't that include both science and religion?

God created us in religion,
Evolution made us in science.

I think we all were made specifically by God, and God only.

"On the sixth day, god created man.
On the seventh day, man returned the favor."

I forget who the quote's by, but it's one of my personal favorites.
Anyways, I believe that we as humans created the concept of god to explain what we didn't understand. In primitive cultures, many of them have worshipped various Sun Gods. As time has progressed and science has improved, we've needed to update our definition of God.

It perplexes me to see that there is no unification form of what has created us. It was always a paradoxical situation.
Science was made by God, and thus God has made us. It's like the tiny text on contracts, and getting to the unspecific details. Evolution could have been a method of creating us, and he wanted good factual evidence to hide the unexplainable. His judgment would not be crystal clear if people found actual proof that he existed, that makes everything too easy.

In religion? You think there are only 3 religions in the world? Thats an awfully broad term for an awfully specific concept.

Scientology teaches that people are immortal beings who have forgotten their true nature. That, to me, is just as absurd as "God created us and everything else".

Buddhism teaches many things that I can't possibly sum up in one short paragraph. It is indeed a religion and it does not say "God made everything".

These are just two examples out of hundreds more. "God created us in Christianity" would have been a better statement there, and it would have made you sound less ignorant.

I never said I thought there were only three religions, and Buddhism isn't a religion, its a way of life. /Offtopic - Humans like to read into what isn't there...

Edit: I did mess up on the quote, so I changed it.

What are you talking about every human being has free choices to believe in what ever they want and just because there is a label on an idea doesnt mean you cant chose to believe in certain aspects of that idea. You can believe in what ever you choose to believe in and if the means puting faith in the scientific aspect of life while taking ideas from the religious aspect than so be it. But do not say you cannot stand on the line divides religion from science.