HTOTM: FUSION
Originally Posted by mosier View Post
People are probably tired of you editing 2-3 joints on a replay they worked hard on just to get 8k extra points, then passing it off as spidey_amazinglyepic+8kflawlesskickhappypwnfuntime .rpl

And this is?? This is why I didn't vote him in the poll. He whines to much, and has to flame everything that doesn't go his way.


Besides, if they worked so fucking hard for it, then they should have made sure there was no way to make it better. Just because I know how to edit replays and make them better doesn't mean I steal replays. I never once took the credit for the replay, I took credit for the editing done by me.
ponies <3 ..-
Sorry for all typos.

"In the end, it is always good,
If it is not good now,
It is not the end."

Quote by-Unkown

Total RedDevil Special Cookies Gained: 3
Total Cookies Gained: 1
Um...Guys can we stop fighting and getting off topic and stick with the record o.o

i didnt except it to get so testy ;___;

-rep:Strongest Flawless Decap 04-23-2008 12:32 AM lol u nub, i cna 2 that

Learn how to write Noob.
Last edited by Kirby; Apr 24, 2008 at 05:51 PM.
Originally Posted by Patrick_Unrated View Post
And this is?? This is why I didn't vote him in the poll. He whines to much, and has to flame everything that doesn't go his way.


Besides, if they worked so fucking hard for it, then they should have made sure there was no way to make it better. Just because I know how to edit replays and make them better doesn't mean I steal replays. I never once took the credit for the replay, I took credit for the editing done by me.

what does the GK poll have to do with me defending people's individual replays that they worked hard on? I don't care about this GK poll, and I don't care about how you voted. You voting for another person wont kill me.
and I "whine" so much because, I would rather not see a person's individual creation get stolen because of a few joint changes. It is probably an opinion between people, but IMO, 8k points out of 600k+ shouldn't justify your name on there.

If someone made an amazing art piece, and you decided to walk in and add one or two brush strokes on it, would that make it yours? Would it make you the sole owner of it to flaunt around, enter into shows and add to galleries? it seems like that is what you are doing.
And yes, by putting your name on the replay, and adding in the tag "spidey_blahbatyblahbatybleh.rpl", you are implying that it is yours.

@Kirby, sorry about these arguments and this... "flaming", but it is kinda on topic
Im defending your record here


Oh, and like, a special message from moltex:

[14:49] <Moltex> you stink like a wet sock
[14:49] <Moltex> pretty much ends it.
Last edited by Mosier; Apr 25, 2008 at 12:12 AM.
5:13 PM - vasp: everybody's nuts is so good
[00:18:38] <&vespesi3n> you should see when i swallow
[21:49:37] <&vespesi3n> >my mouth when
[21:49:43] <&vespesi3n> >my tastebuds when
Originally Posted by mosier View Post
what does the GK poll have to do with me defending people's individual replays that they worked hard on? I don't care about this GK poll, and I don't care about how you voted. You voting for another person wont kill me.
and I "whine" so much because, I would rather not see a person's individual creation get stolen because of a few joint changes. It is probably an opinion between people, but IMO, 8k points out of 600k+ shouldn't justify your name on there.

If someone made an amazing art piece, and you decided to walk in and add one or two brush strokes on it, would that make it yours? Would it make you the sole owner of it to flaunt around, enter into shows and add to galleries? it seems like that is what you are doing.
And yes, by putting your name on the replay, and adding in the tag "spidey_blahbatyblahbatybleh.rpl", you are implying that it is yours.

@Kirby, sorry about these arguments and this... "flaming", but it is kinda on topic
Im defending your record here


Oh, and like, a special message from moltex:

[14:49] <Moltex> you stink like a wet sock
[14:49] <Moltex> pretty much ends it.

No, it does not take any credit to me, I put Spidey on it to show that I edited making it a bit better and to organise my replays I work with. If I was to name it Kirby's_blahblahblahblahblahblah Then I would never be able to find it but that one time. I forget that I worked with it, and never see it again.

Since he is still the person fighting in the replay, it easily shows that Kirby was the sole creator of the replay and that I just edited or did stuff to it. If I was to take the credit, I would have changed it so I was fighting and not him. I would have changed the name of the picture I added the brush strokes to.

When you read a book, it has to be read by specialist looking for grammar errors and every thing before it is published. Those people are there to change parts of it to make it sound better. In other words Make it better. When was the last time you saw them take the credit in making the book..... They didn't change the author of the book. They left it alone after they made it better.
ponies <3 ..-
Sorry for all typos.

"In the end, it is always good,
If it is not good now,
It is not the end."

Quote by-Unkown

Total RedDevil Special Cookies Gained: 3
Total Cookies Gained: 1
No, but you made a stupid post. I am srry for that being mean, but don't know how to say it and get the point across.
ponies <3 ..-
Sorry for all typos.

"In the end, it is always good,
If it is not good now,
It is not the end."

Quote by-Unkown

Total RedDevil Special Cookies Gained: 3
Total Cookies Gained: 1
Originally Posted by Patrick_Unrated View Post
When you read a book, it has to be read by specialist looking for grammar errors and every thing before it is published. Those people are there to change parts of it to make it sound better. In other words Make it better. When was the last time you saw them take the credit in making the book..... They didn't change the author of the book. They left it alone after they made it better.

So you are saying that... people who make something better (such as editors) shouldn't be given full credit for the piece because the author still made the majority of the book?


HEY, thanks for proving my point for me

gg
5:13 PM - vasp: everybody's nuts is so good
[00:18:38] <&vespesi3n> you should see when i swallow
[21:49:37] <&vespesi3n> >my mouth when
[21:49:43] <&vespesi3n> >my tastebuds when
Umm, yes that is exactly what I am saying, and I was never once trying to take all the credit. I put my name on the tile on all my replays so I can sort them, I leave him in the as the player because he made the replay and I didn't want to take the credit. I am just taking credit for the replay and making it better like I have been saying all along. Just like what an editor does. He takes the credit for the edit, but gives the majority of the credit to the maker because he did the most of it.
ponies <3 ..-
Sorry for all typos.

"In the end, it is always good,
If it is not good now,
It is not the end."

Quote by-Unkown

Total RedDevil Special Cookies Gained: 3
Total Cookies Gained: 1
Use replay folders hehe.

I do agree on what you have said with majority credit going to the original artist, but by posting the replay, it makes it seem as though you are showing that you are trying to win the record title.

Anyways, although you were nice enough to keep Kirby's name on this one, I can think of other points in which you weren't as generous (Sorry to bring back my old 950k replay, but I am still a little ticked off about it.)
In any case, I do not think anyone likes us arguing on this thread, but if you would like to keep defending your case, go right ahead. (The Alamo maybe?)

So like, good day to you, and gg.
Last edited by Mosier; Apr 26, 2008 at 12:54 AM.
5:13 PM - vasp: everybody's nuts is so good
[00:18:38] <&vespesi3n> you should see when i swallow
[21:49:37] <&vespesi3n> >my mouth when
[21:49:43] <&vespesi3n> >my tastebuds when