Debt is owing something to something/one else. Am I right?
From my perspective, owing something, say money, is nothing but a hole to dig out of. Think about it...
You use a loan to buy a cash cow. No matter how much your cash cow makes, you will be spending more to get out of the debt then just, yknow, spending money you actually have. Here's how things work in my crib.
You don't have the money? Don't buy it! Cash is king essentially. So simple it hurts xD
Even if you do manage to pay off debt, you end up where you started. I am not seeing any benefits here.
-----
12% AGR? Thats silly. Stop using Wikipedia please.
From my perspective, owing something, say money, is nothing but a hole to dig out of. Think about it...
You use a loan to buy a cash cow. No matter how much your cash cow makes, you will be spending more to get out of the debt then just, yknow, spending money you actually have. Here's how things work in my crib.
You don't have the money? Don't buy it! Cash is king essentially. So simple it hurts xD
Even if you do manage to pay off debt, you end up where you started. I am not seeing any benefits here.
This 'rule' NEVER EXISTED. Money is a proxy for value, even fiat currency has no fixed value.
Not true, people are not obliged to owe debt, let alone to the government.
Bob earns $10 per month, what can he buy? Shit all, you can't buy much with $10. But, Bob can go to the bank, take out a $200 loan with 5%/mo repayment
You are saying it never existed because you have never heard about it... a simple google search can tell you all about it. Here is a good link for you to check out https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41887.pdf
You are saying it never existed because you have never heard about it... a simple google search can tell you all about it. Here is a good link for you to check out https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41887.pdf
You then go on to contradict yourself:
I mean come on.. i know you just like to say what ever without a single thought but that contradiction was literally 2 lines apart.
As good as it is to finally see people with limited options have a chance at making a decent income they can live off of, I can't help but feel that this would lead to a low blow for both teens and other individuals struggling with balancing work and classes/family. Considering the fact that many employers have been getting away with giving their part-time workers a full-time workload without full-time benefits, it's easy to picture that particular practice extending to cover specific minimum wages as well.
Unless laws are put in place to ensure that there's a clear separation between a company's full and part time workers, we could end up seeing a lose/lose labor force where full-time jobs are scarce and part-time workers are disgustingly exploited.
You know, if there was no "economy/capitalism", things would be better. Instead of there having to be 4 million stores, IE; burger kings literally across the street from 20 other restaurants, there would be maybe one restaurant a town because huge corporations won't exist, etc etc. That is so much more efficient.
States have been banning solar power because they have been losing too much money. Do you understand what I meant by "rich" now?
Raising the minimum wage won't change anything really, the prices will just be increased to compensate. What needs to happen is people need to stop being greedy with the profits, and be willing to have less of a profit margin to better everyone else. However, this will never happen due to our way of life. Instead of having lets say 30% profit, cut it down to 15% or 20% (note that this is for the actual owner(s) of the company/business). That extra 10-15% out of even just a $100,000-1,000,000/month is quite a bit that can be distributed more evenly throughout the workforce.
Now, that line, right there, is what rising the minimum wage is all about.
Yes, if all wages were raised it would mean nothing as prices would follow, but to increase the minimum wage would not increase prices (compared to wage) for the weakest in society. Yes, prices would be increased to match the new average from the increased minimum wage, however since higher levels of income would not directly come to rise as to match the new minimum wage, there would be a timezone in which the poorest in society have a better standard of living due to a perceptually higher income as to spending on average consumption-wares.