HTOTM: FUSION
Originally Posted by wibblefox View Post
TP and VIP were great fun and very communal when I was there.

ehhhhhh

eeehhhhhhhhhh

it's very arguable whether that's the case right now. Kinda seems like a lot of people have become inside jokes and current posting revolves around what Lazors referred to as internet jargon. A good chunk of it is kinda lame and passive aggressive.

TP is supposed to be paid wibbles though, so slightly more stringent standards on flaming might work to keep any other board from degenerating into that?

Originally Posted by wibblefox View Post
People cannot decide what is and isn't posted in their thread. If someone posts something "not serious" then just ignore it. Don't let your OCD to reply to ever post dictate the rules.

I think you realise that this argument makes no sense though.

Don't really agree here. There are situations where not serious stuff is just distracting clutter and an obvious eyesore.

Letting people tag their own threads shouldn't be an issue though. Slightly more stringent posting standards for threads personally tagged a different way isn't harmful, and filters discussion to where it's useful and helpful to OP.

Originally Posted by wibblefox View Post
Again who cares if people post something boring or short, it's not a problem, it won't necessarily lead to hostility.




there's a bit of a blurred line there imo. If it's meaningless to the point of being spam I think we can agree that's probably undesirable, and constantly repeated short posts is probably undesirable too

For the record, every bit of your post that I haven't quoted, I agree with.
Last edited by pouffy; Aug 22, 2016 at 10:17 PM. Reason: shite
Originally Posted by wibblefox View Post
1. I don't agree with your assertion. TP and VIP were great fun and very communal when I was there. I haven't seen a clan discussion thread that is hostile ever. I think you should quit your clan if they are bullying you in your own clan thread.
2. Flaming is already banned, so why do you need all these other rules? "Oh god we can't have '3 word story' threads because THERE MIGHT BE HOSTILITY!" It's an absolutely terrible attitude to have, and it has lead to all kinds of fun things being banned because over zealous moderators are afraid of having to do their job.

I never said that Tp threads aren't fun. They're not exactly welcoming though. I'm also not planning to argue about where exactly the line goes. Three word stories is a terrible example because more then half of them go down the lines of primitive dick jokes. There's a good reason to why we've exiled them to clan discussion.

Ok? So what is the point of the forum then, just move everything to irc and clans...... Don't be silly, everyone knows irc and clan discussion is not the same as the general subforum...

You're being extreme. Obviously they're not the same medium, chatting is for chatting, and posting is for posting. If you want to post one sentence posts or other low-content stuff it's not an insane idea to use IRC. You would post on the forum if you have a more concrete thread.


People cannot decide what is and isn't posted in their thread. If someone posts something "not serious" then just ignore it. Don't let your OCD to reply to ever post dictate the rules.

I don't think you understand. It would work like this: If the user wants a serious thread, he would use a [serious] tag. This would mean that the moderation in those threads would be harsher than the usual threads.

I don't think your OCD argument is very good. The fact is that one-liners and memes kill serious threads. The first few posts in a thread decides the tone of the thread. There has to be a distinction between serious and non-serious threads for that reason. It will be incredibly hard to get a serious thread going if people are more interested in shitting the thread away.
Are you against giving people the opportunity to have serious threads? It sounds to me like you're just appealing to one of the sort of people who come to off-topic, while I'm arguing for a lot more freedom for more than one sort of person.


Not sure what you are talking about but all of what I mentioned is about offtopic.

No, moonshake points to a rule specifically in gaming chat. Yes, gaming chat is in off-topic. And the gaming chat rules are really old.


What is the point of this rule, it's offtopic.

Are you really that worried that birthday threads or game threads are going to lead to hostility? If you are so damn worried about hostility just say "no hostility", stop making proxy rules...

Just because a thread is 'boring' to you doesn't mean it should be banned. There are a lot of people here and people find different things interesting. Stop imposing your personal opinion over the entire userbase...

People will tire of birthday threads, and they're not smart enough to simply ignore them. Birthdays and leaving/coming back threads are completely centered around one user. Theoretically and rhetorically, your argument sounds good, but in practice there is a good reason why we added a rule against them.
Again, who cares if the thread is boring, if you are so bored just stop reading. Obviously people are posting because they are interested otherwise the thread would just die.

No, people are posting because it's more fun to give your opinions than to read others. You're not thinking of the people who will have to read the crap. It's not insane to ask for a compromise where the content is fun to post and interesting to read.

IMO mods should just stick to what ACTUALLY IS A PROBLEM. For example if you don't want flaming, then police flaming. Don't ban and close all threads because you are afraid that "Let's count to 100!" will end in hostility... Seems like mods are just too lazy to do their jobs so they are making rules that give themselves less work even if it's detrimental to the community. If you have an excuse to arbitrarily close any thread you see then you don't even have to read it to see if people are breaking rules, just close everything! And thus we have this terrible situation...

No, I still think there has to be some standard to the posts, but I've addressed this.
Brendan (he who passeth judgement on the frequent changing of signatures): I don't do hentai anymore
Yeah, the tagging of serious threads is a good idea if you're concerned with overmoderation, Pig. In Toriprime, the idea came about from the opposite way - people were concerned that everybody was shitting on everybody else too much and all threads would inevitably descend to crap. Some people were angry that they could never have a decent, serious thread there.

I suggested that the community (since it's a premium board) should be able to select the level of moderation they want in their thread. Every thread is assumed to be unmoderated UNLESS the OP tags it as [Serious].

I modded the board and it worked fine for ages until an over-zealous ninja closed a thread that wasn't tagged. I reopened it, wrote 'bawww' or something and was promptly fired. I haven't had TP for a while now (I'll have it back once Parrot wins CL) so I can't comment on the state of it, but the idea of users tagging threads that they want someone to moderate is still a good idea I reckon'.
Well, shit really hit the fan here.

I'm closing this in like an hour so can someone please TLR this for me? I'm not spending any time on that discussion.
Ele Moderated Message:
I'm leaving it open. This is what discussion is for.
Last edited by Ele; Aug 23, 2016 at 08:30 AM.
"Do you explore the unknown or are you afraid of losing your throne?" I am Soon.
Actually, this might end up being productive. Don't close it yet :<


They're talking about moderation guidelines and where the proper line should be drawn when making rules.
@wibblefox

A lot of the OT rules were made as results of things that degraded the section in the past. If we become lenient or don't do our job, which you considered "lazy moderation", then the rules have a high chance of becoming redundant. Some of the rules require a more objective stance. In example; "no useless threads" rule requires a more human response than "no x vs z gaming threads".

At the end of the day, someone needs to help out and the ones that do spend a lot of free time doing so. If we didn't have moderators, pretty much every section would be full of crap.

For the record, unless you're being super toxic, not getting the hint, or being a troll, you're typically never infracted. You are treated and talked to subjectively. I believe the moderation in OT, even if it is much, causes about 0 harm for people who make simple mistakes because we understand that it happens all the time. There is a reason we don't ban everyone who breaks rule d.

I try to mold things in off-topic with the community and if you have ideas for the section, you can let me know.
Chickster: I literally don't know why I did it.
Originally Posted by Pouffy View Post
it's very arguable whether that's the case right now. Kinda seems like a lot of people have become inside jokes and current posting revolves around what Lazors referred to as internet jargon. A good chunk of it is kinda lame and passive aggressive.

And how exactly are inside jokes and internet jargon or "lame" posts a problem?

Just let people post ffs, why do staff always insist on imposing their opinion on to others? You don't laugh at the inside joke? I don't care at all, it's not a reason to ban it.

Originally Posted by Pouffy View Post
TP is supposed to be paid wibbles though, so slightly more stringent standards on flaming might work to keep any other board from degenerating into that?

Again last time I was there this was not true at all, and afaik that board still has a lot of mods.

I'm not sure at what point staff decided that imposing bad rules on the forum is fine so long as people can pay to post somewhere more reasonable.

Originally Posted by Pouffy View Post
Don't really agree here. There are situations where not serious stuff is just distracting clutter and an obvious eyesore.

Letting people tag their own threads shouldn't be an issue though. Slightly more stringent posting standards for threads personally tagged a different way isn't harmful, and filters discussion to where it's useful and helpful to OP.

This will never work, just learn to not respond to every post you see.

Originally Posted by Pouffy View Post
there's a bit of a blurred line there imo. If it's meaningless to the point of being spam I think we can agree that's probably undesirable, and constantly repeated short posts is probably undesirable too

For the record, every bit of your post that I haven't quoted, I agree with.

Spam is spam, we are talking about short posts.

I have been infracted before for answering questions in 1 sentence or whatever, it's just stupid. "Do I need a CPU with the same socket as my mobo?" "yes" - INFRACTED BANNED NO ONE WORD POSTS CRIMINAL SCUM. "What is the rgb for toxic?" "you can find all colors at .../colors.txt" - INFRACTED BANNED NO ONE SENTENCE POSTS CRIMINAL SCUM.

In short it's another one of those "I'm too lazy to read posts so I'll just ban every post that could possibly be bad" rules.

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
I never said that Tp threads aren't fun. They're not exactly welcoming though. I'm also not planning to argue about where exactly the line goes. Three word stories is a terrible example because more then half of them go down the lines of primitive dick jokes. There's a good reason to why we've exiled them to clan discussion.

wow dick jokes ban this sick filth.

Nice unfounded assertion though, if you are that afraid of dick jokes just warn or infract IF IT ACTUALLY HAPPENS.

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
You're being extreme. Obviously they're not the same medium, chatting is for chatting, and posting is for posting. If you want to post one sentence posts or other low-content stuff it's not an insane idea to use IRC. You would post on the forum if you have a more concrete thread.

There's no logic behind this argument it's purely opinion, so I'm not going to respond since it would be fruitless.

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
I don't think you understand. It would work like this: If the user wants a serious thread, he would use a [serious] tag. This would mean that the moderation in those threads would be harsher than the usual threads.

I know how it works, but you still aren't actually stopping people from posting. Especially with such an open to interpretation rule it's as bad as "no useless posts" which is just a coverall for anything that particular staff member dislikes.

If people want to have a serious discussion they can go ahead, just ignore the posts you don't think are serious enough to reply to.

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
I don't think your OCD argument is very good. The fact is that one-liners and memes kill serious threads. The first few posts in a thread decides the tone of the thread. There has to be a distinction between serious and non-serious threads for that reason. It will be incredibly hard to get a serious thread going if people are more interested in shitting the thread away.
Are you against giving people the opportunity to have serious threads? It sounds to me like you're just appealing to one of the sort of people who come to off-topic, while I'm arguing for a lot more freedom for more than one sort of person.

People are interested in different things. Your post seems to imply that people that would otherwise be posting for fun would suddenly become serious just because of the tag, this won't happen.

People are welcome to tag their thread as serious, and they are welcome to ignore posts they don't deem to be serious enough, but ultimately there is no need for a rule.

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
No, moonshake points to a rule specifically in gaming chat. Yes, gaming chat is in off-topic. And the gaming chat rules are really old.

Again I don't know what rule you are talking about and if you don't want to explain then fine, but I can't reply to that obviously.

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
People will tire of birthday threads, and they're not smart enough to simply ignore them. Birthdays and leaving/coming back threads are completely centered around one user. Theoretically and rhetorically, your argument sounds good, but in practice there is a good reason why we added a rule against them.
No, people are posting because it's more fun to give your opinions than to read others. You're not thinking of the people who will have to read the crap. It's not insane to ask for a compromise where the content is fun to post and interesting to read.

Again who cares if people get tired of threads.

Or are you afraid of someone making a dick joke again?!?!?!

Originally Posted by Lazors View Post
No, I still think there has to be some standard to the posts, but I've addressed this.

Again this argument has no logical basis so there's nothing to respond to. You think forums should be akin to writing letters or something, it's not, it's just a place where you can post, there is nothing that inherently requires people to write formally or make long posts or not talk casually or whatever else you imagine.

Originally Posted by Link View Post
@wibblefox

A lot of the OT rules were made as results of things that degraded the section in the past. If we become lenient or don't do our job, which you considered "lazy moderation", then the rules have a high chance of becoming redundant. Some of the rules require a more objective stance. In example; "no useless threads" rule requires a more human response than "no x vs z gaming threads".

"no useless threads" is a coverall that is used to ban anything the staff member dislikes. There is nothing inherently bad about "x vs z" threads. Does it really matter if some people like CS and some people like CoD and then another person posts saying halo is better? No of course it doesn't. Flaming is one thing, but disagreeing and discussing is totally fine. Your problem is imagined.

Banning whole types of threads just because you are concerned about the possibility of a problem is lazy moderation.

Originally Posted by Link View Post
At the end of the day, someone needs to help out and the ones that do spend a lot of free time doing so. If we didn't have moderators, pretty much every section would be full of crap.

Simply not true.

All subs could get by with minimal moderation. I moderated computing for 3 years for example, and there was only 1 troublemaker in that time. Between myself and the other staff members maybe a dozen actions were taken in the entire sub.

Straight after I was kicked out someone else decided to make a bunch of new rules and abuse their power, immediately causing problems. Because of their overmoderation the sub died for a long time and more infractions and moderator actions were taken in a month than in the entire history of the sub.

Originally Posted by Link View Post
For the record, unless you're being super toxic, not getting the hint, or being a troll, you're typically never infracted.

Maybe you can say that about you personally but you are not the only staff member around. Typically there are no warnings for "breaking rules" and the rule that is broken is made up on the spot or is an exceedingly liberal interpretation of the many open ended rules like "useless post". What is a useless post? Well whatever the moderator doesn't like (eg "not being serious enough").


Overall the whole forum needs a lot of work.

EDIT: As an experiment leave this thread open: http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=570924
See if it devolves into a cacophony of hostility and dick jokes.
If you have minions in your avy or sig DO NOT REPLY TO MY POSTS
Originally Posted by wibblefox View Post
People are interested in different things. Your post seems to imply that people that would otherwise be posting for fun would suddenly become serious just because of the tag, this won't happen.

People are welcome to tag their thread as serious, and they are welcome to ignore posts they don't deem to be serious enough, but ultimately there is no need for a rule.

I'm just asking for clarification here.

Are you saying you want shitposts to be allowed in all areas of the forum? If so, do you think people are going to be happy to sift through 5 posts of mindless garbage for every decent post? Hopefully I'm not coming across defensive here - just looking for your stance on this.

I also closed that thread since I'm not going to turn off the rules because a user requested it - maybe if there's a decent discussion and the rules change.
Originally Posted by Fear View Post
I'm just asking for clarification here.

Are you saying you want shitposts to be allowed in all areas of the forum? If so, do you think people are going to be happy to sift through 5 posts of mindless garbage for every decent post? Hopefully I'm not coming across defensive here - just looking for your stance on this.

I also closed that thread since I'm not going to turn off the rules because a user requested it - maybe if there's a decent discussion and the rules change.

We aren't talking about the whole forum we are talking about offtopic, so it's a moot point.

But no, I have no problem with people throwing in a joke or 1 line post or whatever in a regular thread. If the whole thread becomes like that then clearly people don't have interest in having a "serious quality decent" discussion. If it pisses you off then just scroll past it. I often scroll past posts I have no interest me, this does not mean I want to ban these posts, and even when I had the power to I didn't delete them or leave mod messages telling people how much I disliked their posts. Heck even when people were actually breaking the rules, I just left them unless it was causing a problem. You'd be surprised to find that when someone is flaming or making low """quality""" posts other users are perfectly capable of dealing with the situation...

If you don't want to come across as defensive then maybe don't use loaded language like "sift through 5 posts of mindless garbage for every decent post".
If you have minions in your avy or sig DO NOT REPLY TO MY POSTS
Personally i feel that toribash is falling because it is losing ground. What toribash is losing ground to is in the grey unknown. Personally the way i came about toribash is by one of those parkour replays i saw the game as fun but when i downloaded it and palyed it was really confusing because i didn't understand how people where flipping and corking but after my week or two of failing i finally got help from both youtubers and toribashers alike. (sorry for the ramble) But i feel toribash needs to branch out more torbash needs players that are dedicated. if pewdiepie played toribash today and 3 million people watched it in the first i don't know 6 hours toribash would be getting hundreds of downloads but of all those players i feel that only few would stay. Thats why i personally think a big youtuber like pewdiepie would help us but if toribash got a large influx off players i don't think we could handle it.

(This is all my opinion)

people wondering this is a new account i forgot teh password of my old one
Im a freaking lamp.