Originally Posted by
PyroTime
Because being informed is bad?
Brings me back to my point of Hey lets take out sex ed because the peoples in school are underage so they shouldn't know about STDs...
This is hardly related at all.
The vast majority of 14 yearolds cannot approach this subject with any sort of maturity (as much as people try here) - see any cut vs uncut thread on any anonymous board where people dont have a "name" to uphold.
Furthermore, as many children were forced into this by their parents and it is essentially irreversable (save for transplants etc), its not a good idea to talk about this with adolescents because they will a. get defensive b. get offended/upset.
If you want to continue this farce, go ahead. Nothing will be achieved by the cut fags saying "cut is better", the uncut fags saying "uncut is better" and a few cut fags saying "I wish I wasn't cut".
There is no awareness to be had here at all.
Originally Posted by
sprooj
Circumcision is akin to an appendectomy or tonsillectomy. It is a preemptive minor operation to prevent future medical problems. It's just so minor, and so noninvasive that it is predominantly done relatively soon to birth. Additionally, a preemptive circumcision eliminates the problem of emotional fallout after a circumcision later in life.
/thread
The huge majority of these "medical problems" are no reason to cut off a foreskin. The only legitimate reason I can think of to circumcise a child is if they have severe phimosis.
I agree, the thread has definitely run its course.
There's no really huge benefit to either. Foreskin lubricates the head and protects it. Lack of foreskin means you can go months without a shower.
Cool thread, bro.