Christmas Lottery
Originally Posted by Zayex View Post
Just to correct my statement, I mean to say: You can put together parts of creationism and evolution and have a sturdy foundation (Mostly evolution, with a tiny hint of creationism)

Evolution evolved all life (On earth) from single-celled organisms, yet there is (Could be) a god who created the universe, and possibly, bio-engineered us to evolve faster.

That would probably be the best combination of creationist and evolutionist ideas.

In doing so, you forsake support of both positions.

Evolution from single celled organisms eliminates the need for a God who bio-engineers.

There cannot be a combination of creationist and evolutionist ideas.
Last edited by Ray; May 14, 2012 at 07:40 AM.
Mei fati dominus, mei animi dux
Need to PM a SMod?

Unofficial Skimmer of Discussion!

Fabula Magnus wants more able RPers!
Cataclysm is still alive?


Thorn


Wiggi must love me forever now.
Originally Posted by RayA75 View Post
Evolution from single celled organisms eliminates the need for a God who bio-engineers.

There cannot be a combination of creationist and evolutionist ideas.

There can. There is the possibility that a God started all this off and simply kicked back, relaxed, and looked at what ensues. Whether or not he or she (or it) still has an impact on our daily lives is something for a different discussion.

Or, a God could have designed physics and bio-chemical laws so that one-celled life was possible. Maybe in a parallel universe or whatever 2+2=19 or something of the sort, and therefore life is impossible because of that (how doesn't matter).
(Insert some form of an animation or a slightly wise and/or satyrical statement here)
Originally Posted by BlakMuffin View Post
There can. There is the possibility that a God started all this off and simply kicked back, relaxed, and looked at what ensues. Whether or not he or she (or it) still has an impact on our daily lives is something for a different discussion.

Or, a God could have designed physics and bio-chemical laws so that one-celled life was possible. Maybe in a parallel universe or whatever 2+2=19 or something of the sort, and therefore life is impossible because of that (how doesn't matter).

That is not a creationist idea, though.

"i wish i could do that ken watanabe face where his eyes are really wide" -siku 2015
DONSELUKE, MASTER OF LAWSUIT
if you love america please sign this petition
B&B&B&
Originally Posted by BlakMuffin View Post
There can. There is the possibility that a God started all this off and simply kicked back, relaxed, and looked at what ensues. Whether or not he or she (or it) still has an impact on our daily lives is something for a different discussion.

Or, a God could have designed physics and bio-chemical laws so that one-celled life was possible. Maybe in a parallel universe or whatever 2+2=19 or something of the sort, and therefore life is impossible because of that (how doesn't matter).

I take the position that there is a need for a God to exist to create and sustain the universe. This is entirely compatible with evolution. But there's one problem with what you said.

As hanz0 pointed out, its not creationism. It is a cosmological argument, having nothing to do with the creation of the Earth, intelligent design, natural selection, Adam and Eve, and any other aspect of creation or creationism.
Mei fati dominus, mei animi dux
Need to PM a SMod?

Unofficial Skimmer of Discussion!

Fabula Magnus wants more able RPers!
Cataclysm is still alive?


Thorn


Wiggi must love me forever now.
Originally Posted by RayA75 View Post
I take the position that there is a need for a God to exist to create and sustain the universe. This is entirely compatible with evolution. But there's one problem with what you said.

As hanz0 pointed out, its not creationism. It is a cosmological argument, having nothing to do with the creation of the Earth, intelligent design, natural selection, Adam and Eve, and any other aspect of creation or creationism.

Whoops. Kinda left out that part. Well, anyway, I look at creationism by looking at the Bible through the knowledge we have today (and let's all just remember that although it has been supported by a lot of evidence, we don't know rock solid if evolution is exactly what happened to all life).

Keep in mind that Genesis was written well over 5,000 years ago, and that the knowledge they had about the world was very different from what we know now. I will put it out there that I think that we were all created by intelligent design, but not in the process Moses believed when he wrote Genesis. I think that although the process of evolution looks relatively simple, all that has to have originated from somewhere; it personally hurts my head to think that everything just went *poof* or that over a couple billion years we came to be all just by some accident. I think (and I know that a few people will disagree with me, but that's why we're here) that someone had to decide that Carbon and Oxygen would be able to coexist and make plant/animal/everything else life, and that in theory Silicone and Nitrogen would be able to do the same. I find it impossible that all that wonderful shapes in this world, all the laws of physics, the formation of the trees and grass, the animals, everything else exists, and that it was all an accident. I find that not only heartbreaking but highly improbable. To me, something as awesome as us couldn't have been an accident.

But that's just me.

I tend to look at the Bible in a very non-literal way; I think that Adam & Eve were NOT the first humans on Earth, and that the actual creation of Earth did not take 7 days, but 7 "eras", in a sense. The first era was the Big Bang (and let's all remember that the Big Bang in itself is just a theory), the second was the formation of stars, 3rd the formation of Earth, 4th the appearance of water and plants, 5th animals, and 6th the rise of Humans from apes. The 7th is the current era, where God "rests", and nothing much seems to be happening to our development other than knowledge. If we truly still are evolving (if evolving is true in the first place), then we will probably kill ourselves off with our knowledge before we change into a different species, and we may not even notice that we've changed if we don't kill each other off.

Side-note: I apologize if this may not seem like a definite answer at first, but just read through it a few times and you'll get what I mean.
Last edited by BlakMuffin; May 15, 2012 at 06:10 AM.
(Insert some form of an animation or a slightly wise and/or satyrical statement here)
Originally Posted by BlakMuffin View Post
Whoops. Kinda left out that part. Well, anyway, I look at creationism by looking at the Bible through the knowledge we have today (and let's all just remember that although it has been supported by a lot of evidence, we don't know rock solid if evolution is exactly what happened to all life).

Keep in mind that Genesis was written well over 5,000 years ago, and that the knowledge they had about the world was very different from what we know now. I will put it out there that I think that we were all created by intelligent design, but not in the process Moses believed when he wrote Genesis. I think that although the process of evolution looks relatively simple, all that has to have originated from somewhere; it personally hurts my head to think that everything just went *poof* or that over a couple billion years we came to be all just by some accident.

Except that's not what happened. It is possible for different elements to come together to form molecules, then these molecules coming together to form cellular life. The chances for this happening is very slim, but the fact that it is a possible circumstance negates the need for a creator.

I think (and I know that a few people will disagree with me, but that's why we're here) that someone had to decide that Carbon and Oxygen would be able to coexist and make plant/animal/everything else life, and that in theory Silicone and Nitrogen would be able to do the same.

Atomic units work together because of electrons, protons, etc. You may ask the question of why the nature of the universe is how it is, but that is another discussion not having much to do with evolution.

I find it impossible that all that wonderful shapes in this world, all the laws of physics, the formation of the trees and grass, the animals, everything else exists, and that it was all an accident. I find that not only heartbreaking but highly improbable. To me, something as awesome as us couldn't have been an accident.

But that's just me.

Going to c/p my first post.
"You sit down at a poker table the first time in your life. You get a straight flush. The chances of a straight flush are :
72,192.33 : 1 In terms of odds.
That is a pretty big number, and coupled with the fact that you got it sitting down at a poker table the first time in your life, the odds would obviously be tremendously improbable. So, is it more probable that the cards arranged themselves in a straight flush on purpose or that they simply happened to be arranged in a royal flush for you to receive on your first time playing poker?

The answer to this question is that likelihood does not matter. Improbable things happen, however long it takes to happen is irrelevant. For you to say that the cards did it on purpose, the action must be something that requires sentience and/or intelligence (something like, if the cards did your math homework for you). In this chain of events, in which you happened to sit at this poker table your first time playing, you happened to be sitting at the right seat, and you happen to have received the cards you did in the order you did for you to have a straight flush, sentience is not required."

I tend to look at the Bible in a very non-literal way; I think that Adam & Eve were NOT the first humans on Earth, and that the actual creation of Earth did not take 7 days, but 7 "eras", in a sense. The first era was the Big Bang (and let's all remember that the Big Bang in itself is just a theory), the second was the formation of stars, 3rd the formation of Earth, 4th the appearance of water and plants, 5th animals, and 6th the rise of Humans from apes. The 7th is the current era, where God "rests", and nothing much seems to be happening to our development other than knowledge. If we truly still are evolving (if evolving is true in the first place), then we will probably kill ourselves off with our knowledge before we change into a different species, and we may not even notice that we've changed if we don't kill each other off.

Side-note: I apologize if this may not seem like a definite answer at first, but just read through it a few times and you'll get what I mean.

This still leaves us with the argument of intelligent design, which I think is (and hope to have demonstrated as) a very baseless one.
Mei fati dominus, mei animi dux
Need to PM a SMod?

Unofficial Skimmer of Discussion!

Fabula Magnus wants more able RPers!
Cataclysm is still alive?


Thorn


Wiggi must love me forever now.
Personally evolution is more believable than religion... You can not prove something that does not exist. religion there is no proof. evolution we find fossils .
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius,
commander of the Armies of the North,
General of the Felix Legions,
loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Father to a murdered son,
husband to a murdered wife.
And I will have my vengeance, in this life or the next.
Originally Posted by speakesy1 View Post
Personally evolution is more believable than religion... You can not prove something that does not exist. religion there is no proof. evolution we find fossils .

Arguments for religion that are in my opinion sound, are not conflicting with evolution.

Also, the idea that there is a God is a very valid philosophical standpoint, backed up with convincing arguments and sound reason.
Mei fati dominus, mei animi dux
Need to PM a SMod?

Unofficial Skimmer of Discussion!

Fabula Magnus wants more able RPers!
Cataclysm is still alive?


Thorn


Wiggi must love me forever now.
Evolution is a well regarded theory with a wealth of evidence supporting it.

Stop being hipster faggots and agree.

<3 RayA.
<sireal> chuck you're a gay cunt
<Chuck_Gaming> I am
I don't understand this thread, are we supposed to pretend that evolution doesn't exist?

It would be nice if someone explained what is going on in this thread, because it seems like people are pretending that evolution doesn't exist and trying to argue about it... But it does exist so isn't that pointless?

Next we will have a thread "is there such thing as trees or are they elves in disguise?"... Neither this nor that are discussion material...


Originally Posted by RayA75 View Post
Arguments for religion that are in my opinion sound, are not conflicting with evolution.

I agree with this. In addition Genesis does not conflict with evolution, even Pope John Paul II said he agreed with evolution, and attempted to integrate the scientific theory in to Christian archaic beliefs, more or less saying that evolution is a tool used by God - which is far more acceptable than claiming that things made by God can never change!
Last edited by ImmortalCow; May 20, 2012 at 05:34 PM.